In this scenario, the patient has removed life support and planned for organ transplantation. The ethical concerns of organ donation are very challengeable in case of cardiac death. As the parents have different opinions, it is very complex to take a decision. The ethical committee has to resolve the issues by obtaining opinions from physicians, mediators, parents, and to assess the ethical values. The committee should follow the donor rule before taking decisions. The parents should understand the benefits and importance of transplantation and shows their interest in it. According to donor rule, removal of one's organ before the death of a person to save the life of another person is similar to the killing of a person. If the circulatory failure has been confirmed as permanent, then the organ donation is ethically acceptable. Moreover, the patient itself, given consent for organ donation in her driving license. So, it is legally acceptable.
what should happen next ? on what ethical and moral grounds ? what about the law...
Discussion - Brain Death: Ethical Considerations Your patient is a 23-year-old female with a history of headaches. This morning she was experiencing a really bad headache as her boyfriend was driving her to the university. He thought she was sleeping and by the time they got to the school, 45 minutes later, she was not waking up. She was diagnosed with a cerebral aneurysm and you are taking care of her in the Neurological ICU. What testing do you expect...
Your patient is a 23-year-old female with a history of headaches. This morning she was experiencing a really bad headache as her boyfriend was driving her to the university. He thought she was sleeping and by the time they got to the school, 45 minutes later, she was not waking up. She was diagnosed with a cerebral aneurysm and you are taking care of her in the Neurological ICU. What testing do you expect to be performed to diagnose brain...
what discuss can you make about medicalization and chronic disease and illness? Adult Lealth Nursing Ethics mie B. Butts OBJECTIVES After reading this chapter, the reader should be able to do the following: 1. Explore the concept of medicalization as it relates to the societal shift away from physician predominance of the 1970s. 2. Differentiate among the following terms: compliance, noncompliance, adherence, nonadherence, and concordance. 3. Examine cultural views with regard to self-determination, decision making, and American healthcare professionals' values...
Using the book, write another paragraph or two: write 170 words: Q: Compare the assumptions of physician-centered and collaborative communication. How is the caregiver’s role different in each model? How is the patient’s role different? Answer: Physical-centered communication involves the specialists taking control of the conversation. They decide on the topics of discussion and when to end the process. The patient responds to the issues raised by the caregiver and acts accordingly. On the other hand, Collaborative communication involves a...
Evaluate the arical writ the response in which you state your agreement or disagreement with writer up un these questions guidelines 1) can empathy lead us astrary? how 2) our heart will always go out to the baby in the well, its a measure of our humanity. but empathy will have to yield to reason if humanity is to have a future can empathy yield to reason? how? thank you The Baby in the Well: The Case against Empathy* -Paul...