Question

You should aim to take an evaluative, critical stance in your essay on whether research by Bigelow and La Gaipa has been useful for understanding children's friendship. You should aim to describe and weigh up the arguments for and against the assertion that Bigelow and La Gaipa's work has usefully informed our understanding of children's friendship. . 1 .1. 11 about

Answer 1

Aus weron Bigelow and La Gaipa in 1975 started a sturely on children friendship . At that time there were little known on childrens s'friendship.. # For the's objective ther conduered a test theat was to write an essay for thier friendship to the children of age between 6 to Thes the collected the sample of more than noo essays and categorise these outcomes of the reason of their friendship with the same sex. #They found that the children of older are were More expressive and elaborative to the reason. of their friendship which included, Loyaliff, Sharing and commitment. And another aspect was more on importance of similarity in attitudes, values. # But the problem was that the children. of younger age were not able to express their views on it so it became complex for them to know the reason of the friendship inchiddren with early childhood.

# Here stipport the copepo vization of Bigelow and La Gaipa asout the reason of frievelship carrong children with older age, os. it is based on corality and attitueles and values sat do not cheak that it is soole for the younger ones. # According to my point of view the children with younger age are more concerned about their friend while playing. They become friends in games. Also they have concern about the friend if he or she starts playing with other Child.