Question

Lee and Mary want Nick to replace Lee as a party to their contract. They can...

Lee and Mary want Nick to replace Lee as a party to their contract. They can best accomplish this by agreeing to

an accord and satisfaction.
an assignment.
a novation.
a nullification.

Which of the following is a true statement?

In a limited liability company in the U.S., members cannot participate in management.
In a limited liability company in the U.S. members must participate in management.
The typical state limited liability company (LLC) statute in the U.S. would provide that unless the members agree otherwise, all profits of the LLC will be divided equally.
Corporations do not possess any rights under the U.S. Constitution since corporations are artificial legal entities and not real person

Which of the following is not a correct statement concerning the reasons sufficient to give a court power to dissolve a partnership?

A partnership may be dissolved if one of the partners is declared physically disabled or mentally incompetent.
A partnership may be dissolved because a partner is shown to be not adequately performing his or her part of the partnership contract.
A partnership may be dissolved if the business can only be carried on with substantial continuing losses.

A partnership may be dissolved if one of the partners commits misconduct or gross negligence or materially breaches the partnership agreement.

The transfer of rights under a contract to a third party is called:

An assignment.
An adjudication.
A resolution.
A delegation to an obligee.

Which of the following is a true statement?

The trier of fact in a jury trial is the judge.
In most trials, the defendant bears the burden of proof.
Voir dire
is the process by which the judge informs the jury about what law to apply when they decide the case.
An appellate court reviews the record of the trial court.

The doctrine in negligence law which shifts the burden of proof from the plaintiff to the defendant is:

Negligence per se.
Res ipsa loquitur.
Apparent negligence.
Good Samaritan.

Which of the following is not a correct statement?

The common law of contracts governs all types of contracts in the U.S. without exception.
A contract is an agreement between two or more parties that can be enforced in court of law.
Pursuant to the objective theory of contracts, the intention to enter into a contract is determined by the objective facts that are interpreted by the “reasonable prudent person” standard.
The agreement component of a contract consists of an offer and an acceptance under the common law.

Which of the following best describes the overall scheme of pollution regulation in the United States?

Exclusively federal law.
Exclusively state law with minimal federal oversight.
Exclusively state law, but with considerable federal oversight.
Primarily federal law, but considerable state law as well.

X offers to sell Y a computer. Y sends an acceptance via the mail. This acceptance is generally effective when it is

in transit.
received.
sent or dispatched.
written.

The "fair use" doctrines applies to:

Patent law
The employment at-will doctrine
Copyright law
The National Labor Relations Act.
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Ans 1: a novation

Ans 2: The typical state limited liability company (LLC) statute in the U.S. would provide that unless the members agree otherwise, all profits of the LLC will be divided equally.

Ans 3: A partnership may be dissolved because a partner is shown to be not adequately performing his or her part of the partnership contract

Ans 4: An assignment

Ans 5: An appellate court reviews the record of the trial court

Ans 6: Res ipsa loquitur

Ans 7: The common law of contracts governs all types of contracts in the U.S. without exception

Ans 8: Primarily federal law, but considerable state law as well

Ans 9: sent or dispatched

Ans 10: Copyright law

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Lee and Mary want Nick to replace Lee as a party to their contract. They can...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • 2.        Early English courts a.        relied exclusively on Norman Law. b.        included courts of law and...

    2.        Early English courts a.        relied exclusively on Norman Law. b.        included courts of law and equity. c.         heard cases that only applied to the nobility. d.        were often subject to bribery. 4.        A legal precedent a.        is no longer valid 50 years after the case is decided. b.        is no longer valid 100 years after the case is decided. c.         cannot be overruled. d.        remains valid unless and until overruled by a later case or statute. 5.        Judicial...

  • The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the...

    The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the Washington state court system; i.e. the trial court of general jurisdiction, the intermediate appellate court, the state supreme court. 3. Remember, Washington is in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. Under both the Washington state and federal court system, there is one appeal as of right. Appeals to the Washington Supreme Court(in the state system), or to the U.S. Supreme Court in...

  • 25. An exculpatory clause is a contract clause which a places total responsibility for injury or...

    25. An exculpatory clause is a contract clause which a places total responsibility for injury or damages to property on an insurance company excuses a party from liability for his or her own negligence is unconscionable because the UCC so provides Imits the time for collecting damages. 26. Won agreement is in part legal and in partiogal: a. the total agreement is vold b. the legal performance will be enforced provided that the illegal performance does not involve serious moral...

  • 1. Acme Transit Corporation challenges a Texas law, claiming that it unlawfully interferes with interstate commerce....

    1. Acme Transit Corporation challenges a Texas law, claiming that it unlawfully interferes with interstate commerce. A court will likely: a. balance Texas’s interest is regulating the matter against the burden that it places on interstate commerce.   b. uphold the statute.   c. strike down the statute under the Supremacy Clause. d. balance the burden on Texas vs. the purpose and merit of interstate commerce 2. The U.S. Supreme Court was asked to decide whether same-sex sexual harassment is a violation...

  • 1. Which article and section of the U.S. Constitution outlines the concept of extradition        (returning fugitives...

    1. Which article and section of the U.S. Constitution outlines the concept of extradition        (returning fugitives to the state where the crime occurred).   2. A member of the Senate can kill a bill by talking it to death in a procedure known as a 3. Who acts as the President of the Senate? 4. Who is the current Speaker of the House of Representatives? 5. Which of the following are a Constitutional requirement for becoming          president of the United States?...

  • TRUE/FALSE. Circle Tir the statement is true and 'F if the statement is false. Business law...

    TRUE/FALSE. Circle Tir the statement is true and 'F if the statement is false. Business law consists of the enforceable rules of conduct that govern commercial relationships. Tor F 2) Model or uniform laws are a source of law that are binding on courts. Tor F 3) Presidents base the power to issue executive orders on Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution, which establishes the constitutional power of the president to take care that the laws be faithfully executed."...

  • TRUE/FALSE ___1. A reference to “RCW 4.12.020" means that a statute can be found on page...

    TRUE/FALSE ___1. A reference to “RCW 4.12.020" means that a statute can be found on page 12 of volume 4 of the Revised Code of Washington, part 20. ___2. The United States Congress has adopted one particular approach to ethics, and made it a part of the United States Code; all United States businesses must follow only those statutes in the United States Code, and are not allowed to determine what their businesses’ approaches to ethics will be. ___3. An...

  • Gargantua Equipment Corporation registers its trademark as provided by federal law. This registration gives notice that...

    Gargantua Equipment Corporation registers its trademark as provided by federal law. This registration gives notice that the mark belongs exclusively to Gargantua. This notice is a. limited to Gargantua’s market. b. national. c. limited to Gargantua’s home state. d. limited to those who have actual notice of it. Sally injured when a can of Remove-It explodes into flames. Solvents Inc. manufactured the Remove-It. Under product liability laws, Quint’s options include a. ordering a halt to the production of Remove-It. b....

  • 61)Which best describes the reason that federal marijuana laws trump the state of California’s legal recreational...

    61)Which best describes the reason that federal marijuana laws trump the state of California’s legal recreational marijuana law? Unitary executive theory Habeas corpus Establishment Clause Preemption 60) The standard of review in which the government must prove the law is justified by a compelling government interest is known as: Minimal scrutiny Reparation Affirmative action Strict Scrutiny Internment 59) he term reparations refers to: the practice of providing affirmative action to targeted populations to achieve diversity goals. the standard of review...

  • Case review for Alaska Packers Assoc. v Domenico (9th Circuit, 1902) Issue, Ruling, Application, Conclusion   ROSS, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case was based upon a contract alleged to have been...

    Case review for Alaska Packers Assoc. v Domenico (9th Circuit, 1902) Issue, Ruling, Application, Conclusion   ROSS, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case was based upon a contract alleged to have been entered into between the libelants and the appellant corporation on the 22d day of May, 1900, at Pyramid Harbor, Alaska, by which it is claimed the appellant promised to pay each of the libelants, among other things, the sum of $100 for services rendered and to be rendered....

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT