use ILAC (ISSSUES, LAW, APPLICATION AND conclusion) to
answer below question.
1000 words/ no copy paste please
Important points of this case:
Each partner will have an authority to enter into a contract of up to $10,000, but the contracts in excess of that amount require the agreement of all the partners.
Issues
List of expenses incurred by Jane and Sarah in the absence of Anne and Mary without their knowledge.
Law
As per general principals of law of contracts and its Relations of partners, the partnership is formed between Anne, Mary, Jane and Sarah to form a partnership of general practitioners in Western Sydney, for a common business they call Your Local Doctor and signed an agreement of partnership with equal rights. In the agreement it is clearly stated that “each partner will have an authority to enter into a contract of up to $10,000, but the contracts in excess of that amount require the agreement of all the partners”.
So all the partners do have equal authority and Rights to take part in business
Right to be consulted
As per the agreement, when an individual activity involves an expenses amount exceeding $10000, even an amount of $10001 need to be acknowledged by each partners involved in the business and signed in a legal paper as a proof
In every partnership contract, it is the primary duties of every partner in a business who have entered into an agreement need to take care of the following:
Application:
First Thing Anne and Mary need to do is go through all the expenses occurred during their absence. It is also their prime duty to ensure that each activity has incurred less than $10000.
Irrespective of the supplier and its worth for a particular amount, Anne and Mary are supposed to pay for their share. Because the amount is less than $10000 and in the agreement contract it is nowhere mention that the purchase should be made for lower value quotation or to a particular supplier for a particular products / items. Share per head is $500
This invoice is need not be addressed by all the partners of the business and as per the agreement it wasn’t taken to the knowledge of Anne and Mary before buying the medical instrument. So, the amount will be paid by Jane. Because its worth exceeded the actual amount stated in the agreement. If in case, the partners agreed to take part for the expense on the welfare of the business and the good faith they have on Jane, They can Share for the amount which is mentioned in the agreement. i.e., $10000. So the share of an every individual for the medical instrument is $2500 per head other than Jane. Share per head is $2500 and for Jane $2500+3000
Though Sarah had previously argued that four doctor should run a local ride share service, it is nowhere entered in the agreement. So it is keen to reject the invoice from Uber Australia as a part of Your Local Doctor’s expense. If in case it has entered in the agreement anywhere, then it can be paid by their respective share, Share per head is $500
Conclusion
Anne and Mary are liable to pay for Printing paper alone as per agreement, so their respective is $500 per head. If in case, they are already aware of Sarah’s Argument of driver training and considered it as an part of business activities. They need to pay their respective share of $500 per head. Not liable for medical instrument ordered by Jane.
use ILAC (ISSSUES, LAW, APPLICATION AND conclusion) to answer below question. 1000 words/ no copy paste...
answer question #5 use this to answer the question Smallpox Incidence and Death in 18th centruy Boston, MA Cases of naturally acquired smallpox Cases of inoculated smallpox Death from smallpox — % of population The graphs in Figure 2 (right) tell the story of naturally-acquired and inoculated smallpox deaths in Boston in the 1700s. Consider the findings in the upper part of the graph in light of the findings shown in the lower part. State the overall conclusion to be...
Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are inseparable. For B-Money, the two predictably merged when he was negotiat- ing a deal for his tracks. At other times, the merger is unpredictable, like when your business faces an unexpected auto accident, product recall, or government regulation change. In either type of situation, when business owners know the law, they can better protect themselves and sometimes even avoid the problems completely. This chapter...
Case: Enron: Questionable Accounting Leads to CollapseIntroductionOnce upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant “E,” slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm laid off 4,000...
CASE 20 Enron: Not Accounting for the Future* INTRODUCTION Once upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant "E" slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm...