Given that many mergers and acquisitions fail, why do you think that executives keep making horizontal integration moves?
There have been studies on mergers and acquisitions, success from which have been few but still executives look toward horizontal integration is due to the fact that it is a pathway to so many benefits that executives want to reap. Horizontal integration, first of all, provides cost effectiveness by achieving economies of scale which means less cost per unit and more profits. Also horizontal integration clears the way and eases the competition as one of the competitors join hands with the other and both focus together on achieving the same goal. One of the more appealing points to consider for horizontal integration is that it paves the way to easier and smoother distribution to markets unreachable before. For instance, if a Tennessee company merges with a new jersey company and starts distribution there, they'd be able to tap those markets which they couldn't before.
All the above mentioned points describe the motive behind choosing horizontal integration.
Given that many mergers and acquisitions fail, why do you think that executives keep making horizontal...
From the non-financial accounting perspective, do you think mergers and acquisitions are a good thing it a bad thing and why?
CASE Study - Cisco Mergers and Acquisitions strategies In the past, the decision criteria for mergers and acquisitions were typically based on considerations such as the strategic fit of the merged organizations, financial criteria, and operational criteria. Mergers and acquisitions were often conducted without much regard for the human resource issues that would be faced when the organizations were joined.1 As a result, several undesirable effects on the organizations’ human resources commonly occurred. Nonetheless, competitive conditions favor mergers and acquisitions...
Why do so many companies fail to have a strategy? Why do managers avoid making strategic choices? Or, having made them in the past, why do managers so often let strategies decay and blur? Does the company you work for have a strategy? What is it? It is decaying?
Case Study: In the past, the decision criteria for mergers and acquisitions were typically based on considerations such as the strategic fit of the merged organizations, financial criteria, and operational criteria. Mergers and acquisitions were often conducted without much regard for the human resource issues that would be faced when the organizations were joined. As a result, several undesirable effects on the organizations’ human resources commonly occurred. Nonetheless, competitive conditions favor mergers and acquisitions and they remain a frequent occurrence....
REVIEW . Imagine you work in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) for TD. You are about to enter into a negotiation to merge two construction companies. Do you think it would be better to have a distributive or integrative negotiation, and explain why (1 point). Independent of your last answer, imagine your boss has told you that your goal is to create value in the negotiation. What are two strategies to do this (1 point)? Describe how you would use those...
Define Customer Relationship Management. What are the keys to making it work? Why do you think that Customer Relationship Management may fail to achieve its goals?
a) Do you think intuition is respected as a decision-making style? Do you think it should be? Why or why not? b) Do you prefer to make decisions in a group or alone? What are the main reasons for your preference?
Do you think intuition is respected as a decision-making style? Do you think it should be? Why or why not? Share an example of anchoring. Do you prefer to make decisions in a group or alone? What are the main reasons for your preference?
LP5 Assignment 1. What do you think went wrong here from a Human Resource point of view? 2. What occurred behaviorally within the top management team? 3. What would you have done differently as VP of Human Resources and why? 4. What strategy do you think the CEO was using in keeping others away? What potential logical motivations might he have had? 5. In a due diligence process what usually takes place especially from the HR Department in a company...
Why do you think organizations have increased the use of groups for making decisions during the past 20 years? Do you think it is a good idea? When do you think you would use it as a manager?