The iconic In-N-Out Burger, Inc. burger chain plans to sue an Australian burger restaurant called Down-N-Out, claiming that the eateries were trying to mimic themselves after In-N-Out and mislead customers into believing that Down-N-Out has received the endorsement or is in some other way affiliated with In-N-Out Burger. Which legal remedy should they seek?
a. Injunction
b. conjunction
c. specific performance
d. reformation
Answer - Injection
Injection refers to the legal remedy provided by the courts. In this case, In-N-Out should seek for an injunction as a remedy. They can sue them by saying it is bothering their company and it is a nuisance to you.
A Thumbs Up! Would be really helpful for me. If you have any questions, please leave a comment and I will get back to you as soon as possible.
The iconic In-N-Out Burger, Inc. burger chain plans to sue an Australian burger restaurant called Down-N-Out,...