Question

3. A cohort study of smoking and bladder cancer was conducted in a small island population. There were a total of 1,000 people on the island. Four hundred were smokers and 600 were not. Fifty of the smokers developed bladder cancer. Ten of the non-smokers

a.       What is the exposure and what is the disease?

b.       Set up the two by two table for these data with labels for exposures and disease status.

c.       Which measure of association/comparison should we use to assess the strength of the relationship between the exposure and disease?

d.       Calculate the correct measure and show your work.

e.       How do we interpret this effect estimate?


1 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

(a)Active cigarette smoking is a major risk factor for bladder cancer. exposure to cigarette smoke may also contribute to bladder carcinogenesis.

Smoking tobacco is the most important known risk factor for bladder cancer. Previous studies found that 20% to 30% of bladder cancer cases in women were caused by smoking. However, most of the earlier studies were conducted at times or in areas where smoking was much less common among women.

Smoking cigarettes, cigars or pipes may increase the risk of bladder cancer by causing harmful chemicals to accumulate in the urine. When you smoke, your body processes the chemicals in the smoke and excretes some of them in your urine.

The exposure is smoking and disease is bladder cancer.

Exposure

(a) exposure**

Exposure smoking status
400 people active smokers
600 people secondhand smokers

Disease status**

Disease status smoking status
Bladder cancer 50 out of 400
Second exposure of smoking

10 out of 600

(c) The basis of an extensive body of scientific evidence, active cigarette smoking has been considered to be causally associated with bladder cancer. The evidence from cohort studies has been remarkably consistent in indicating a twofold or greater excess risk of developing or dying from bladder cancer among current smokers compared with never A meta-analysis of observational epidemiologic studies estimated that, compared with never smokers, the risk of urinary tract (primarily bladder) cancer was elevated more than threefold among current smokers and twofold among former smokers . Active cigarette smoking is a major contributor to the population burden of bladder cancer. To augment the already extensive evidence from case-control studies, additional evidence from large cohort studies is valuable for more precisely characterizing the risks of active cigarette smoking and strengthening the overall foundation for making the claim of a causal association.

The causal relation between active cigarette smoking and bladder cancer provides reason to suspect that secondhand cigarette smoke (also known as environmental tobacco smoke or passive smoke) may also contribute to bladder carcinogenesis. As with active cigarette smoking, secondhand cigarette smoke contains arylamines, which are established bladder carcinogens . The dose of carcinogen exposure from secondhand smoke is less than that from active cigarette smoking, but even so, the relatively low dose of carcinogens from secondhand smoke exposure has been hypothesized to make a disproportionately large contribution to bladder carcinogenesis .This is because, among persons exposed to cigarette smoke, those who are genetically more susceptible to tobacco toxins are hypothesized to have greater bladder cancer risks in general but also risks that are disproportionately higher at low levels of exposure . The plausibility of an association between secondhand smoke and bladder cancer is further strengthened by the fact that carcinogens have been measured in the urine of passive smokers showing that carcinogens from secondhand smoke come into direct contact with the bladder.

The hypothesis that secondhand smoke exposure is a risk factor for bladder cancer has only rarely been explored in epidemiologic studies, despite the established link between active cigarette smoking and bladder cancer and a strong rationale for suspecting that secondhand cigarette smoke exposure could contribute to bladder carcinogenesis.

(d)Collection of smoking information on all household members directly provided the data with which to investigate active cigarette smoking habits and, by determining whether a never smoker resided with a cigarette smoker, a measure of household exposure to secondhand smoke. Respondents classified their active cigarette smoking status into one of three categories: never, former, or current smoking.

(e) prospective cohort study provide further confirmation of the important role that active cigarette smoking plays in the etiology of bladder cancer. The marked elevation in risk associated with active smoking provides additional data which further support the evidence that smoking causes bladder cancer.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
3. A cohort study of smoking and bladder cancer was conducted in a small island population. There were a total of 1,000 people on the island. Four hundred were smokers and 600 were not. Fifty of the smokers developed bladder cancer. Ten of the non-smokers
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • In the United States, among a representative group of 6,006 white men and 1,126 black men, ages 70-79 years at diagnosis with stage IV prostate cancer, 2,337 white men and 344 black men were alive after 5 years of follow-up. The goal of this analysis is t

    a.       What is the exposure and what is the disease?b.       Set up the two by two table for these data with labels for exposures and disease status.c.       Which measure of association/comparison should we use to assess the strength of the relationship between the exposure and disease?d.       Calculate the correct measure and show your work.e.       How do we interpret this effect estimate?

  • Case control study

    A study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between artificial sweeteners and bladder cancer. 3,000 cases and 3,000 controls were enrolled in the study. Among the cases, 1293 had used artificial sweeteners in the past, while 1707 had never used artificial sweeteners. Of the controls, 855 had used sweeteners and 2145 had not.a.       What is the exposure and what is the disease?b.       Set up the two by two table for these data with labels for exposures and disease status.c.       Which...

  • 1. Spasmodic dysphonia (SD) is an idiopathic, chronic, and disabling voice disorder. In a case-control study,...

    1. Spasmodic dysphonia (SD) is an idiopathic, chronic, and disabling voice disorder. In a case-control study, 150 cases of SD were identified along with 150 controls. Of those with SD, 16 had previously experienced meningitis. Of the controls, 3 had previously experienced meningitis. a. Which measure of association/comparison should we use to assess the strength of the relationship between the exposure and disease? b. Calculate the correct measure and show your work. c. How do we interpret this effect estimate?

  • The study also provided mortality rates for cardiovascular disease among smokers and non-smokers....

    The study also provided mortality rates for cardiovascular disease among smokers and non-smokers. The following table presents lung cancer mortality data and comparable cardiovascular disease mortality data. Table 2. Mortality rates (per 1,000 person-years), rate ratios, and excess deaths from lung cancer and cardiovascular disease by smoking status, Doll and Hill physician cohort study, Great Britain, 1951-1961. Mortality rate per 1,000 person-years Smokers Non-smokers All Rate ratio Excess deaths Attributable risk per 1,000 person-years smokers 1.23 2.19 percent among 1.30...

  • In your opinion, which of the below three study design is best to assess the relationship...

    In your opinion, which of the below three study design is best to assess the relationship between smoking and CRC? Why? (6 sentences) No plagiarism please Cross Sectional Study 1. Verga Enterprises is conducting a study to assess the relationship between smoking and colorectal cancer (CRC). In the survey that was conducted, 20 out of 100 non-smokers had CRC, while 40 out of 60 smokers had CRC. (a) What makes this a Cross Sectional study design? This particular case is...

  • A prospective study of Norwegian women who were followed between 1986 and 2009 was conducted. Within...

    A prospective study of Norwegian women who were followed between 1986 and 2009 was conducted. Within that period (1995-2005), a national mammography program was gradually implement ed, with biennial invitations send to women age 50-69. The participants of the study were all women aged 50-79 between 1986-2009. The mortality rate ratios compared women who were invited to screen to those who were not invited, with a clear distinction between cases of breast cancer diagnosed before and after the invitation to...

  • Lung Cancer & Smoking Case Study A causal relationship between cigarette smoking and lung cancer was...

    Lung Cancer & Smoking Case Study A causal relationship between cigarette smoking and lung cancer was first suspected in the 1920s on the basis of clinical observations. To test this apparent association, numerous epidemiologic studies were undertaken between 1930 and 1960. Two studies were conducted by Richard Doll and Austin Bradford Hill in Great Britain The first was a case-control study begun in 1947 comparing the smoking habits of lung cancer patients with the smoking habits of other patients. The...

  • 3-The population in the city of Houston from 1900 to 2010 is given below: Year Population...

    3-The population in the city of Houston from 1900 to 2010 is given below: Year Population 1900 44,633 1910 78,800 1920 138,276 1930 292,352 1940 384,514 1950 596,163 1960 938,219 1970 1,233,505 1980 1,595,138 1990 1,631,766 2000 1,953,631 2010 2,100,263 a. Give a scatter-plot and residual plot of the data. b. Based on the graphs in part a, propose a model for the data. Show me evidence to support your conclusion. Go through all necessary steps to construct a model...

  • In Data 4.1 on page 258, we examine a study in which mice were randomly assigned to either a norm...

    In Data 4.1 on page 258, we examine a study in which mice were randomly assigned to either a normal light/dark cycle or to have a light on around the clock. According to the paper describing that study, "The global increase in the prevalence of obesity and metabolic disorders coincides with the increase of exposure to light at night." The study is examining whether light at night plays a causal role in the obesity epidemic. In Data 4.1, we examine...

  • In a study of 380 diabetics and nondiabetics, patients were classified as underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese according to their diabetes status. The probability of being normal weight is...

    In a study of 380 diabetics and nondiabetics, patients were classified as underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese according to their diabetes status. The probability of being normal weight is 0.31 and the probability of having diabetes is 0.39. If you select two individuals from the population, the probability of being diabetic and normal weight is 0.09. What is the probability that either of the two randomly selected individuals (or both) will be diabetic or normal weight? a. Pr (diabetic...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT