1 A renewable energy electricity supply technology has the following characteristics: Capital cost ($) Annual operating cost ($) Lifetime (years) Salvage value ($) Annual electricity supplied (MWh) 300 000 27 200 25 40 000 400 1.1 If the owner can sell the electricity at 25 c/kWh, what is the simple payback period for the technology? 1.2 Would the owner invest in this technology if (s)he set a strict maximum four-year payback period? 1.3 What would the selling price for the electricity have to rise to for the owner to invest in the technology if (s)he set a maximum three-year payback period? 1.4 What is the Present Worth (Net Present Value) of the investment over a 25 year assessment period and real discount rate of 5% when the electricity price is 25 c/kWh? 1.5 What is the real internal rate of return for the owner of this technology over a 25-year assessment period when the electricity price is 30 c/kWh? Would the owner invest if their threshold real rate of return was 30%? 1.6 Derive an analytical relationship between simple payback period and internal rate of return (IRR) over a 15-year assessment period for a project with a single fixed capital payment (K) at the beginning of year 1 and equal constant-dollar annual net benefits over this period (B). Hint: the simple payback period will be K/B. Use the equation for IRR given in the week 2 lecture. Then solve this equation iteratively using Excel for payback periods between 1 and 15, and plot the corresponding graph of IRR vs Payback Period 1.7 With reference to your answers to 1.1 to 1.6, discuss briefly the limitations of the simple payback period as an evaluation criterion and why this can disadvantage renewable energy technologies compared to conventional fossil fuel power supply (at least 200 words). ….Continued on next page 2 2.1 Using the same figures as in question 1, calculate the lifecycle cost of the technology over an assessment period of 25 years at a real discount rate of 5% 2.2 Calculate the average unit cost of the power in present value terms (in cents/kWh) supplied by the technology over its lifetime at this real discount rate. 2.3 What is the corresponding Levelised Cost of Electricity (LCOE) (in cents/kWh)? Why is this value higher than that obtained in question 2.2? (Note: LCOE will not be covered in lectures until week 3.) 2.4 How would the competitiveness of this electricity from a renewable energy source be changed if there was (a) a price on carbon, and (b) a Clean Energy Target? 3 Using the figures in the table in Q1 as a baseline, work out an expression for Present Worth with real discount rate, assessment period, salvage value, and electricity price as independent variables. Then changing just one variable at a time (other things being kept equal) plot graphs of Present Worth versus each of these variables. Use a range of assessment periods up to the lifetime of the technology. Explore the effects of both positive and negative salvage values. On the basis of these graphs and the lectures presented, critically discuss the relative influence of these variables on Present Worth, and hence the more general implications for the economic assessment of renewable energy technologies. You may wish to relate variations in electricity price to carbon pricing. 300 words minimum. Note: to simplify the calculation of present worth, for assessment periods less than the lifetime, neglect the residual value of the technology, and assume salvage values are only incurred at the end of the lifetime of the technology.
Initial cash flow: | ||||||||
Capital cost | $300,000 | |||||||
Annual Cash flow: | ||||||||
Annual operating cost | $27,200 | |||||||
Number of years(Lifetime) | 25 | |||||||
Annual electricity supply (MWh) | 400 | |||||||
Terminal Cash flow: | ||||||||
Salvage value | $40,000 | |||||||
1.1 | CALCULATION OF SIMPLE PAYBACK PERIOD | |||||||
Selling price per KWh | $0.25 | |||||||
A | Annual Cash inflow=0.25*400000 | $100,000 | ||||||
B | Annual Cash out flow(Operating cost) | $27,200 | ||||||
C=A-B | Net annual Cash inflow | $72,800 | ||||||
D=300000/C | Simple Payback period(Initial cash flow/72800) | 4.120879121 | Years | |||||
Simple Payback period | 4.1 | Years | ||||||
1.2 | ||||||||
Under Strict maximum payback period of 4 years; | ||||||||
Owner will not invest in this technology | Rejected | |||||||
1.3 | Maximum 3 year payback period: | |||||||
Annual net cash inflow required=300000/3 | $100,000 | |||||||
Annual revenue required=100000+27200 | $127,200 | |||||||
Selling price required=127200/400000 | $ 0.32 | per KWh | ||||||
Selling price required=32 cents/KWh | ||||||||
1.4 | CALCULATION OF NET PRESENT VALUE | |||||||
Net Present value= Sum of (Present Value(PV) of cash flows) | ||||||||
Present Value (PV) of Cash flow=(Cash flow)/((1+i)^N) | ||||||||
i=discount rate=5%=0.05 | ||||||||
N=Year of the cash flow | ||||||||
Yearwise cash flow and PV of cash flows are given below: | ||||||||
N | A | B=A/(1.05^N) | ||||||
Year | Cash flow | PV of Cash flow) | ||||||
0 | ($300,000) | -300000 | ||||||
1 | $72,800 | 69333.33333 | ||||||
2 | $72,800 | 66031.74603 | ||||||
3 | $72,800 | 62887.37717 | ||||||
4 | $72,800 | 59892.74016 | ||||||
5 | $72,800 | 57040.70492 | ||||||
6 | $72,800 | 54324.48088 | ||||||
7 | $72,800 | 51737.60083 | ||||||
8 | $72,800 | 49273.90556 | ||||||
9 | $72,800 | 46927.5291 | ||||||
10 | $72,800 | 44692.88486 | ||||||
11 | $72,800 | 42564.65225 | ||||||
12 | $72,800 | 40537.76404 | ||||||
13 | $72,800 | 38607.39433 | ||||||
14 | $72,800 | 36768.94698 | ||||||
15 | $72,800 | 35018.04474 | ||||||
16 | $72,800 | 33350.5188 | ||||||
17 | $72,800 | 31762.39886 | ||||||
18 | $72,800 | 30249.90367 | ||||||
19 | $72,800 | 28809.43207 | ||||||
20 | $72,800 | 27437.55435 | ||||||
21 | $72,800 | 26131.00415 | ||||||
22 | $72,800 | 24886.67062 | ||||||
23 | $72,800 | 23701.59106 | ||||||
24 | $72,800 | 22572.94387 | ||||||
(72800+40000 | 25 | $112,800 | 33310.15265 | |||||
Total | 737851.2753 | |||||||
Net Present value= Sum of (Present Value(PV) of cash flows)= | $ 737,851 | |||||||
1.5 | CALCULATION OF INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN WITH PRICE=30cent/KWh | |||||||
Annual Sales Revenue with 30 cents per KWh | $ 120,000 | |||||||
Annual Cash inflow(120000-27200)= | $ 92,800 | |||||||
Year | Cash flow | |||||||
0 | ($300,000) | |||||||
1 | $92,800 | |||||||
2 | $92,800 | |||||||
3 | $92,800 | |||||||
4 | $92,800 | |||||||
5 | $92,800 | |||||||
6 | $92,800 | |||||||
7 | $92,800 | |||||||
8 | $92,800 | |||||||
9 | $92,800 | |||||||
10 | $92,800 | |||||||
11 | $92,800 | |||||||
12 | $92,800 | |||||||
13 | $92,800 | |||||||
14 | $92,800 | |||||||
15 | $92,800 | |||||||
16 | $92,800 | |||||||
17 | $92,800 | |||||||
18 | $92,800 | |||||||
19 | $92,800 | |||||||
20 | $92,800 | |||||||
21 | $92,800 | |||||||
22 | $92,800 | |||||||
23 | $92,800 | |||||||
24 | $92,800 | |||||||
(92800+40000) | 25 | $132,800 | ||||||
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) | 30.90% | Using IRR function of excel over the cash flow) | ||||||
|
1 A renewable energy electricity supply technology has the following characteristics: Capital cost ($) Annual operating...
The developer and owner of a shopping mall is planning to install solar PV panels on the roof top. Project Costs: The 100-kw system will cost $225,000 to install on 600 m2 of space available on the roof top. It will have a useful life 20 years and a salvage value of $2,000. Annual operations and maintenance cost will be $1,500. Energy output: Based on Singapore weather conditions, the system is capable of producing 170,000 kwh of electricity in the...
Question The developer and owner of a shopping mall is planning to install solar PV panels on the roof top. Project Costs: The 100-kw system will cost $225,000 to install on 600 m2 of space available on the roof top. It will have a useful life 20 years and a salvage value of $2,000. Annual operations and maintenance cost will be $1,500. Energy output: Based on Singapore weather conditions, the system is capable of producing 170,000 kwh of electricity in...
Problem 5-53 (algorithmic) Show WorkQuestion Help Advanced Modular Technology (AMT) makes energy cleaner, safer, more secure and more efficient. It typically exhibits net annual revenues that increase over a fairly long period. In the long run, an AMT project may be profitable as measured by IRR, but its simple payback period may be unacceptable. Evaluate this AMT project using the IRR method when the company MARR is 16% per year and its maximum allowable payback period is two years. What...
A plant that supplies 1 unit of electricity per year, costs $1 billion to build, lasts 25 years, and has an annual operating cost of $0.2 billion; it costs $0.1 billion to decommission the plant at the end of its lifetime (25 years). (Assume that the construction costs and the operating costs are paid at the beginning of the period, and that the decommissioning cost is paid at the end of the life of the plant.) The annual discount rate...
Advanced Modular Technology (AMT) makes energy cleaner, safer, more secure and more efficient. It typically exhibits net annual revenues that increase over a fairly long period. In the long run, an AMT project may be profitable as measured by IRR, but its simple payback period may be unacceptable. Evaluate this AMT project using the IRR method when the company MARR IS 12% per year and its maximum allowable payback period is three years. What is your recommendation? Capital investment at...
this is the full question tho 3. (20%) A certain wind turbine is rated at 5 MW and has an installed cost of $6,000,000. The capacity factor is 0.38. The turbine is paid for with a down payment of 1/10 of the installed cost and a loan. The loan interest rate, b, is 8% and the period of the loan, N, is 15 years. The economic lifetime of the turbine, L, is to be 20 years, the inflation rate is...
A business wants to reduce its energy use. One option is to replace ten existing 50 watt fluorescent lights with ten new, 8 watt LED lights that provide the same amount and quality of lighting. The lights are used 12 hours per day, 250 days per year. The cost of electricity is $0.2/kWh. Each LED light costs $1 Assume the new lights last 10 years and that the time frame of the analysis is 10 years. Assume that the electricity...
1. Suppose a university has an opportunity to build a solar facility just outside of the city that would generate about 120,000 MWh per year (1 MWh = 1000 KWh), and cost $25 million to install. To determine if this is a good deal for the university, you need to analyze the economics. Assume the market price for electricity over the next five years is $48 per MWh and there is a 5-year project horizon. Evaluate this decision using a...
1. Suppose MSU has an opportunity to build a solar facility just outside of Ann Arbor that would generate about 120,000 MWh per year (1 MWh = 1000 KWh), and cost $25 million to install. To determine if this is a good deal for the university, you need to analyze the economics. Assume the market price for electricity over the next five years is $48 per MWh and there is a 5-year project horizon. Evaluate this decision using a 3%...
I really need help with number 5 1. Suppose MSU has an opportunity to build a solar facility just outside of Ann Arbor that would generate about 120,000 MWh per year (1 MWh = 1000 KWh), and cost $25 million to install. To determine if this is a good deal for the university, you need to analyze the economics. Assume the market price for electricity over the next five years is $48 per MWh and there is a 5-year project...