Question

1. What is just war theory?

2. What is pacifism?

3. If violence is wrong, why is it wrong? Is it that violence is a violation of people`s rights? or is there some other reason?

Answer 1

•Just war theory (Latin: jus bellum justum) is a teaching, additionally alluded to as a convention, of military morals considered by military pioneers, scholars, ethicists and approach producers. Just war theory hypothesizes that war, while horrible (however less so with the correct direct), isn't generally the most noticeably terrible choice.

•Pacifism is restriction to war, militarism or violence. The word pacifism was authored by the French harmony campaigner Émile Arnaud and received by other harmony activists at the tenth Universal Peace Congress in Glasgow in 1901. A related term is ahimsa, which is a center way of thinking in Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism.

•Violence is right by definition, yet it is prima facie wrong. That implies when violence happens we should suspend moral judgment on the occasion until the culprit justifies their activities. The demonstration of violence of assault isn't right, yet the demonstration of violence of warding off an attacker is right. It is just if no justification approaches, or the justification given is lacking, that we can say that the violence wasn't right.

It isn't generally that violence is an infringement of other's privileges . It is for the situation when the violence is about assault , abusive behavior at home and so forth.

Be that as it may, what we get because of violence is however the ideal yet not the good one . The entire outcome isn't acceptable . What's more, Gandhi's standards of nonviolence instructed us that we can get anything we desire by the utilization of nonviolence .

Thanks and plzz don’t forget to hit thumbs up:)....