Suppose that you are interested in determining whether the advice given by a physician during a routine physical examination is effective in encouraging patientsto stop smoking. In a study of current smokers, one group of patients was given a brief talk about the hazards of smoking and was encouraged to quit. A second group received no talk related to smoking. All patients were given a follow-up exam. In the sample of 150 patients who had received the talk, 25 reported that they had quit smoking. In the sample of 90 patients that hadn’t received a talk, 8 had ceased smoking.
a. Create a 2x2 table out of the data provided in the question.
b. Use Chi-square test to determine whether a difference exists in the proportion of smokers that had quit smoking between the two groups. Choose α = 0.05.
a)
below is contingency ta ble:
Smoking | ||||
quit | not quit | total | ||
Talk | received | 25 | 125 | 150 |
not received | 8 | 82 | 90 | |
total | 33 | 207 | 240 |
b)
null hypothesis: there is no difference exists in the proportion of smokers that had quit smoking between the two groups
alternate hypothesis: there is a difference exists in the proportion of smokers that had quit smoking between the two groups
degree of freedom (row-1)*(column-1)=(2-1)*(2-1)=1
for 1 df and 0.05 level rejection region 2 >3.841
applying chi square test:
Expected | Ei=Σrow*Σcolumn/Σtotal | quit | not quit | Total |
received | 20.625 | 129.375 | 150 | |
not received | 12.375 | 77.625 | 90 | |
Total | 33 | 207 | 240 | |
chi square χ2 | =(Oi-Ei)2/Ei | quit | not quit | Total |
received | 0.928 | 0.148 | 1.076 | |
not received | 1.547 | 0.247 | 1.793 | |
Total | 2.475 | 0.395 | 2.869 |
as test statsiic 2.869 is not in rejection region ; we can not rject null hypothesis
we do not have evidence at 0.05 level to conclude that there is a difference exists in the proportion of smokers that had quit smoking between the two groups.
Suppose that you are interested in determining whether the advice given by a physician during a...
What advice would you provide to Kathleen with regard to the CMO and Linda? Make sure you support your position(s). From the onset, what would you recommend Kathleen do differently the next time she is faced with a similar situation? Tools* Download Human Resources in Healthcare Managing for Success Experiential Exercises Sexual Orientation Discrimination have been difficult because the health center Case was located in a rural county in Mississippi Note: This case was written by Brian Cooper: Kathleen was...
Please read the article bellow and discuss the shift in the company's approach to genetic analysis. Please also discuss what you think about personal genomic companies' approaches to research. Feel free to compare 23andMe's polices on research with another company's. Did you think the FDA was right in prohibiting 23andMe from providing health information? These are some sample talking points to get you thinking about the ethics of genetic research in the context of Big Data. You don't have to...
Evaluate the arical writ the response in which you state your agreement or disagreement with writer up un these questions guidelines 1) can empathy lead us astrary? how 2) our heart will always go out to the baby in the well, its a measure of our humanity. but empathy will have to yield to reason if humanity is to have a future can empathy yield to reason? how? thank you The Baby in the Well: The Case against Empathy* -Paul...
10. Write a one-page summary of the attached paper? INTRODUCTION Many problems can develop in activated sludge operation that adversely affect effluent quality with origins in the engineering, hydraulic and microbiological components of the process. The real "heart" of the activated sludge system is the development and maintenance of a mixed microbial culture (activated sludge) that treats wastewater and which can be managed. One definition of a wastewater treatment plant operator is a "bug farmer", one who controls the aeration...