a)
yes, data appears to be linear
b)
X | Y | (x-x̅)² | (y-ȳ)² | (x-x̅)(y-ȳ) |
75 | 644 | 36.00 | 2640.38 | 308.31 |
76 | 646 | 25.00 | 2438.84 | 246.92 |
77 | 658 | 16.00 | 1397.61 | 149.54 |
78 | 669 | 9.00 | 696.15 | 79.15 |
79 | 675 | 4.00 | 415.53 | 40.77 |
80 | 689 | 1.00 | 40.76 | 6.38 |
81 | 698 | 0.00 | 6.84 | 0.00 |
82 | 699 | 1.00 | 13.07 | 3.62 |
83 | 714 | 4.00 | 346.53 | 37.23 |
84 | 719 | 9.00 | 557.69 | 70.85 |
85 | 727 | 16.00 | 999.53 | 126.46 |
86 | 744 | 25.00 | 2363.46 | 243.08 |
87 | 758 | 36.00 | 3920.69 | 375.69 |
ΣX | ΣY | Σ(x-x̅)² | Σ(y-ȳ)² | Σ(x-x̅)(y-ȳ) | |
total sum | 1053 | 9040 | 182 | 15837.1 | 1688.00 |
mean | 81.00 | 695.38 | SSxx | SSyy | SSxy |
sample size , n = 13
here, x̅ = Σx / n= 81.00 ,
ȳ = Σy/n = 695.38
SSxx = Σ(x-x̅)² = 182.0000
SSxy= Σ(x-x̅)(y-ȳ) = 1688.0
estimated slope , ß1 = SSxy/SSxx = 1688.0
/ 182.000 = 9.2747
intercept, ß0 = y̅-ß1* x̄ =
-55.8681
so, regression line is Ŷ = -55.868
+ 9.275 *x
R² = (Sxy)²/(Sx.Sy) = 0.9885
98.85% of variation is explained by this line
c)
α= 0.05
t critical value= t α/2 =
2.201 [excel function: =t.inv.2t(α/2,df) ]
estimated std error of slope = Se/√Sxx =
4.06024 /√ 182.00 =
0.301
margin of error ,E= t*std error = 2.201
* 0.301 = 0.662
estimated slope , ß^ = 9.2747
lower confidence limit = estimated slope - margin of error
= 9.2747 - 0.662
= 8.61
upper confidence limit=estimated slope + margin of error
= 9.2747 + 0.662
= 9.94
Engineers concerned about a tower's stability have done extensive studies of its increasing tilt. Measurements of...
Engineers concerned about a tower's stability have done extensive studies of its increasing tilt. Measurements of the lean of the tower over time provide much useful information. The following table gives measurements for the years 1975 to 1987. The variable "lean" represents the difference between where a point on the tower would be if the tower were straight and where it actually is. The data are coded as tenths of a millimeter in excess of 2.9 meters, so that the...
Engineers concerned about a tower's stability have done extensive studies of its increasing tilt. Measurements of the lean of the tower over time provide much useful information. The following table gives measurements for the years 1975 to 1987. The variable "lean" represents the difference between where a point on the tower would be if the tower were straight and where it actually is. The data are coded as tenths of a millimeter in excess of 2.9 meters, so that 1975...
Engineers concerned about a tower's stability have done extensive studies of its increasing tilt. Measurements of the lean of the tower over time provide much useful information. The following table gives measurements for the years 1975 to 1987. The variable "lean" represents the difference between where a point on the tower would be if the tower were straight and where it actually is. The data are coded as tenths of a millimeter in excess of 2.9 meters, so that the...
Engineers concerned about a tower's stability have done extensive studies of its increasing tilt. Measurements of the lean of the tower over time provide much useful information. The following table gives measurements for the years 1975 to 1987. The variable "lean" represents the difference between where a point on the tower would be if the tower were straight and where it actually is. The data are coded as tenths of a millimeter in excess of 2.9 meters, so that the...
The Leaning Tower of Pisa is an architectural wonder. Engineers concerned about the tower's stability have done extensive studies of its increasing tilt. Measurements of the lean of the tower over time provide much useful information. The following table gives measurements for the years 1975 to 1987. The variable "lean" represents the difference between where a point on the tower would be if the tower were straight and where it actually is. The data are coded as tenths of a...