What is the implicit premise that will make this argument valid?
Not everyone in this country had health insurance. Therefore, health care is a disaster.
An implicit premise is a premise that supports the main conclusion but is not expressed or stated directly.
In this case, the main conclusion is "Health care is a disaster".
The premise is " Not everyone in this country had health insurance.
In order to make this argument valid, the suppressed premise or the implicit premise must be stated.
So, the implicit premise is "Low-Income families who are uninsured cannot afford expensive medical bills and as a result, do not seek health care."
What is the implicit premise that will make this argument valid? Not everyone in this country...
Construct three arguments: 1. A valid deductive argument with a false premise. 2. A valid deductive argument with a false conclusion. 3. A strong inductive argument with a false premise.
1.An inductive argument: a) is a valid argument b) is a sound argument c) is probable reasoning d) all of the above 2.What is not a premise indicator? a)because b)since c)therefore d)it follows from
QUESTION 2 Determine whether the following argument is valid using the long or short truth-table method. Premise 1 If Angela is hungry, she eats pizza. Premise 2 Angela is not eating pizza. Therefore, Angela is not hungry. The above argument is a) valid b) invalid
1. Please provide a natural deduction proof for the following valid, deductive argument: Premise 1: ~ ( F & A ) Premise 2: ~ ( L v ~ A ) Premise 3: D > ( F v L ) / ~ D 2. Answer the following question: can one prove invalidity with the natural deduction proof method? Why or why not? 3. Answer the following question: can one construct a natural deduction proof for an invalid argument in SL? Why...
5. Symbolize the following argument and prove it is a valid argument. Let B ( x ) = x is a bear; D ( x ) = x is dangerous, and H ( x ) = x is hungry. Every bear that is hungry is dangerous. There is a hungry animal that is not dangerous. Therefore there is an animal that is not a bear. 6. In order to prove an quantificational argument invalid it is only necessary to find a...
1.Select the correct answer (treat this passage as an argument): Households that have guns are significantly less likely to be victims of crime. Therefore, people should keep guns in their homes. Question 1 options: Unstated premise: The presence of guns causes a decrease in crime Unstated conclusion: People should keep guns in their homes Unstated premise: People should do things that make them less likely to be victims of crime No unstated elements None of the above. 2. Select the...
PART II: Given only these promises, supply the conclusion that will make the argument deductively valid. No plants are mammals A pasque flower is a plant. Therefore 2. All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, If animals are sentient, then animals deserve moral consideration. If animals deserve moral consideration, then it is wrong to cause them unnecessary suffering. Therefors 4. If he acts rightly in the face of danger, then he is courageous. He acts rightly in the...
Should everyone be required to have health care insurance? What are the pros and cons? Thanks for the help!
What is the missing premise in the following argument? "All murder is wrong. So, abortion is wrong." A. Wrong actions should be avoided B. Murder is abortion C. Abortionists are immoral D. Abortion is murder
Multiple Choice Question 3:
Which of the following is an example of an outcome-based
morality argument in opposition to the following
statement: The government should assure everyone has access to
health core regardless of ability to pay.
a. "Giving health care away to everyone will just encourage
people to be irresponsible with their personal finances and
personal health."
b. "It is a fundamental violation of my liberty for the
government to take my taxes and use them to benefit someone...