Please SUMMARIZE this article define the main problem and what they are trying to study. Briefly summariZe the main FINDINGS & CONCLUSION.
Who performed and published this article?
Explain how the type of publication affects the validity of the information.
Who do you think is the intended audience of this article, and how did you deduce that?
What was the sample size?
b) Who was included in the sample? (sex, race, gender, orientation, age, etc.)
c) Identify the methods used to gather the information in the study.
o Examples: Case studies, survey (questionnaires or interviews) Direct observation, or experimental method.
d) Analyze the reliability of these methods
ANALYZE the author's results and conclusion based on the
data.
Identify at least one critique, author’s bias or validity
concerns in the results and conclusion sections.
Based on your overall evaluation of the article, does this article provide valid and quality scientific information about a biological
aspect of human sexuality? Why or why not? * this is your educated opinion
What is the value of the article? What does it contribute to our understanding
of human sexuality?
***This is questions are all based on the study***
SUMMARY OF THE ARTICLE AND MAIN POINTS OF THE ARTICLE:
To assess the occurrence of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence across sexual orientation groups around United States. The study has been conducted amount U.S. adults.
MAIN FINDINGS & CONCLUSION:
The data collected were compared with heterosexual woman both bisexual women and lesbians who experienced more sexual violence, there is another classification made in the article; contact sexual violence and noncontact unwanted sexual violence by any performer. It also includes the homosexual men who experienced more stalking. There was no significant difference between different groups in the research.
CONCLUSION: The obtained results showed that there are significantly elevated burden of sexual violence that have been experienced by certain minority people.
Who performed and published this article?
Explain how the type of publication affects the validity of the information.
Who do you think is the intended audience of this article, and how did you deduce that?
Examples: Case studies, survey (questionnaires or interviews) Direct observation, or experimental method.
d) Analyze the reliability of these methods
ANALYZE THE AUTHOR'S RESULTS AND CONCLUSION BASED ON THE DATA:
Identify at least one critique, author’s bias or validity concerns in the results and conclusion sections.
Based on your overall evaluation of the article, does this article provide valid and quality scientific information about a biological aspect of human sexuality? Why or why not?
What is the value of the article? What does it contribute to our understanding of human sexuality?
What is the value of the article? What does it contribute to our understanding of human sexuality?
1.After reading the assigned article, what is the title of the article and when was it written? 2. Who is the author(s) of the article and what gives them the credibility, if any, to write the article? 3. In 2-3 sentences, what is the article trying to convey to the general public? 4. Can you rely on the information obtained in this article? Why or why not-give 2 reasons? Study finds cancer link for muscle-building supplements April 13, 2015 A...
Write critique responses to this question: 7. What strategies are used to analyze the data of this article? Abstract This qualitative study used interviews to explore nurses’ perceptions of their role in protecting children and to identify any barriers to implementing the role. Participants in this study were recruited through purposive sampling. Ten nurses whose work brings them into regular contact with children and their families were interviewed; the sample included nurses from acute care and community-based nursing services in...
For this article write two paragraphs on what your personal thoughts are about this article. Do you agree with the article or not. Is there anything in this article that relate to you about your community? Please do not summarize Global warming has significant negative consequences for human health, with some groups at greater risk than others. The extent to which the public is aware of these risks is unclear; the limited existing research has yielded different findings. Our new...
This assignment is due 2/25 and is worth 50 points Opinion Paper and Comparative Critique: Print Media and Website Information Objective: This assignment will test your ability to critically analyze popular media nutrition information, according to its content, whether you think the information is valid and/or accurate based on the principles you are learning from the course. This will help you to integrate and apply knowledge from class materials and/or relevant personal experiences. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Instructions: Note: This is one assignment...
Summarize below article 300 words no plagiarism. Thanks INTRODUCTION Informed consent is a decision to participate in research, taken by a competent individual who has received the necessary information; who has adequately understood the information; and who, after considering the information, has arrived at a decision without having been subjected to coercion, undue influence or inducement, or intimidation. Informed consent is a prerequisite for enrolling human subjects in biomedical research. The concept of “Informed consent” was enshrined in the Nuremberg...
SCIENTIFIC READING AND WRITING ASSIGNMENT YOUR NAME: _ _______________________________________________________________ COURSE_:_Cell Biology ________________________________________________________________ Exercise 1.1: Find a primary scientific research article Title: Cross-Tissue Identification of Somatic Stem and Progenitor Cells Using a Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Derived Gene Signature. ______________________________________________________________________________ Citation: The scientific research paper is located: Journal name: Year : 16 October 2017 Issue # (if applicable) : 04 December 2017 Volume # (if applicable) 35 _______________________________________________________ Page # 2390-2402 Exercise 1.2: Citation Identify the first author(s) (it is authors if there...
Read article published in US Today titled “Does eating organic food prevent cancer? Yes, a new study suggests”. Identify the following: What is Y (outcome)? What is primary X (explanatory var)? What type of data? Write down an empirical model that you think was estimated: Do you think that established relationship is causal or it is s imply association? Why? People who regularly eat organic food are less likely to develop cancer than those who don't, according to a new...
After reading the synopsis of this article, what single phrase would you choose to describe this article (content of the article) ? Why would you choose this word? List of single phrases to choose from: WOW SURPRISING INTERESTING UNLIKELY IMPOSSIBLE ABOUT TIME WASTED EFFORT NO REAL CHANGE INNOVATIVE NO WAY SO WHAT Article: Design and implementation of a clinical decision support tool for primary palliative Care for Emergency Medicine (PRIM-ER) Audrey Tan Mark Durbin, Frank R. Chung, Ada L. Rubin,...
open in new window, why arent we talking to our partners about sex? this is realted to psychology of human sexuality class... JL YOU PLEJ POJL3. Reflect on what you read in the text and the articles below. Make sure to demonstrate that you read the articles. Identify the importance of communicating about sex with your partner and share how couples can work on improving their sexual communication, MUST READ: Interrelationships between sexual self-esteem, sexual assertiveness and sexual satisfaction.pdf Why...
Based on the article "Proxy War," create your own argument that either supports or counters the author's argument (you either agree with the author's conclusion [support his argument] or you disagree with the author's conclusion [counter his argument]). Be sure you are not just developing your argument with the opinion that you already have. This means you must first recognize your initial point of view and your own assumptions about the topic, so you can approach it with an open...