Question

please help

Which quality below illustrates poor scientific methodology? A scientist considers all evidence, and not just those data which support his/her hypothesis A scientist gladly shares the protocol for her experiment with a lab in a different University A scientist notices a white squirrel.concludes the squirrel fell in a bucket of white paint, and designs a demonstration to show how it happened A scientist with 2 Nobel prizes is thankful when a couple of graduate students show him to be incorrect about the structure of DNA

Answer 1

Thinking that it was fallen in a white paint bucket about a white squirrel and thinking about to demonstrate it is the poor scientific methodology from the given examples.
Hence, 3rd option is the correct answer.

The independent variable is the thing in the experiment that the researcher changes.
Hence, 3rd option is the correct answer.

Telling by a patient that she feels queasy is the qualitative data from the given example.
Hence, 1st option is the correct answer.

An explanation, broad in scope, and supported by a growing body of evidence is known as "the scientific theory".
Hence, 3rd option is the correct answer.

Deductive reasoning is a specific conclusion that follows a general theory. Here, "15 flying animals have wings. So, wings are required for animals to fly" is a deductive conclusion from a scientific law.
Hence, 3rd option is the correct answer.