2. Suppose a language is decidable.
• Prove the language is recognizable.
• Prove the language’s complement is also recognizable.
Recognizable Language
A electronic computer M acknowledges language L if L = L(M). we are saying L is Turing-recognizable (or merely recognizable) if there's a metal M specified L = L(M).
Decidable Language
A electronic computer M decides language L if L = L(M) and M halts on all inputs. We are saying L is decidable if there's a metal M that decides L. Call issues area unit issues that need a yes/no answer on a given input
They need a precise correspondence to languages: L could be a illustration of downside P if And provided that an input x ∈ L if declare x is affirmative in downside P.
Prove the language’s complement is additionally recognizable.
Definition: A language is named semi-decidable (or recognizable) if there exists AN algorithmic program that accepts a given string if and provided that the string belongs thereto language. just in case the string doesn't belong to the language, the algorithmic program either rejects it or runs forever.
Clearly, any decidable language is recognizable. we tend to still have to be compelled to see whether or not or not there area unit recognizable languages that aren't decidable, and whether or not or not there area unit languages that aren't recognizable.
Proposition: The recognizable languages area unit closed underneath union and intersection.
Proof: Let L and M be languages that area unit recognized by algorithms A and B severally. so as to make a decision their union (or intersection) merely run A and B in parallel on a similar given input string. The input string is accepted once either one (or each, respectively) accepts it.
Proof: sure, a decidable language is recognizable. Moreover, if a language is decidable, and then therefore is its complement, and thus that complement is recognizable.
Now suppose a language L and its complement is recognizable. Let A be a recognizer for L, and B for its complement. a call technique for L is obtained by running A and B in parallel on a given input string. just in case A accepts the string, it's accepted as a member of L, and just in case B accepts it, it's rejected as member of L. one in all these outcomes can occur among a finite quantity of your time.
2. Suppose a language is decidable. • Prove the language is recognizable. • Prove the language’s...
Classify the language { (G) | G is a CFG, L(G) contains a palindrome}\ as (a) decidable (b) Turing-recognizable but not co-Turing recognizable (c) co-Turing recognizable but not Turing-recognizable (d) neither Turing nor co-Turing recognizable Justify your answer
Only 5-9 please 1. (10 points) True/False. Briefly justify your answer for each statement. 1) Any subset of a decidable set is decidable 2) Any subset of a regular language is decidable 3) Any regular language is decidable 4) Any decidable set is context-free 5) There is a recognizable but not decidable language 6) Recognizable sets are closed under complement. 7) Decidable sets are closed under complement. 8) Recognizable sets are closed under union 9) Decidable sets are closed under...
Q1: Which of the following claims are true?* 1 point The recognizable languages are closed under union and intersection The decidable lanquages are closed under union and intersection The class of undecidable languages contains the class of recognizable anguages For every language A, at least one of A or A*c is recognizable Other: This is a required question Q2: Which of the following languages are recognizable? (Select all that apply) 1 point EDFA-{ «A> 1 A is a DFA and...
Give examples of the following sets (languages): a. A set (language) that is Turing-recognizable but not decidable b. A set (language) that is decidable but not context-free c. A set (language) that is context-free but not regular
I need to prove follow: Let be a semi-decidable language. Then the language (Kleene star) is semi-decidable. We were unable to transcribe this imageWe were unable to transcribe this image
Quick Quiz Is the following true? 1. If L is Turing-decidable, L is Turing- recognizable If L is Turing-recognizable, L is Turing- decidable 2. 3. If L is Turing-decidable, so is t 4. If L is Turing-recognizable, so is L 5. If both L and L are Turing-recognizable, L is Turing-decidable
Prove that a language A is decidable if and only if it is finite or there is a computable function f : N → {0,1)' such that range(f) = A and each f(n) comes strictly before f(n + 1) in the standard enumeration of 10, 1*.
I need 7 - 10. Ignore others please! 1. (10 points) True/False. Briefly justify your answer for each statement. 1) Any subset of a decidable set is decidable 2) Any subset of a regular language is decidable 3) Any regular language is decidable 4) Any decidable set is context-free 5) There is a recognizable but not decidable language 6) Recognizable sets are closed under complement. 7) Decidable sets are closed under complement. 8) Recognizable sets are closed under union 9)...
Please also note that there might be multiple answers for each question. Q1: Which of the following claims are true?* 1 point The recognizable languages are closed under union and intersection The decidable languages are closed under union and intersection The class of undecidable languages contains the class of recognizable languages For every language A, at least one of A or A*c is recognizable Other: This is a required question Q2: Which of the following languages are recognizable? (Select all...
5. (1 point) Which of the following statements is true? A. Recognizable languages are a subset of the decidable languages. B. Some decidable languages may not be recognizable. C. A decider for a language must accept every input. D. A recognizer for a language doesn't halt. E. A decider halts on every input by either going to an accept state or a reject state. 6. (1 point) Which of the following could be false for the language L = {abclixj...