Question

A team of researchers examined the brain systems involved in human romantic love. One issue was...

A team of researchers examined the brain systems involved in human romantic love. One issue was whether romantic love images a part of the brain called the caudate (a brain structure know to become active when people win money in an experimental tasks, are given cocaine, and other such “reward” situations). Thus, the researchers recruited individuals who had very recently fallen “madly in love.” (For example, to be in the study participants had to think about the partner at least 80% of their waking hours.) Participants brought a picture of their beloved with them, plus a picture of a neutral person (someone of the same age and sex as their beloved with whom they were very familiar, but about whom they did not have any particularly strong feelings). Participants then went in to the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) machine and their brain was scanned while they looked at the two pictures – 30 seconds at the neutral persons’ picture, 30 seconds at their beloved, 30 seconds at the neutral person, and so forth. The data are below. Student Beloved’s photo Control photo 1 1487.8 1487.2 2 1329.4 1328.1 3 1407.9 1405.9 4 1236.1 1234.0 5 1299.8 1298.2 6 1447.2 1444.7 7 1354.1 1354.3 8 1204.6 1203.7 9 1322.3 1320.8 10 1388.5 1386.8 What do you make of this data? 1. You should probably state the null and alternative hypotheses; 2. You should probably examine the descriptive statistics (esp. the means); 3. You should probably run a paired-t (because you are comparing means of the same people, a paired t is required); 4. You should present a conclusion;

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

1.)

0

HA uD0

The null hypothesis is defined as there is no difference in the test score of two treatment and the alternative hypothesis is that there is a significant difference in test score of two treatment.

2)

The mean and standard deviation for the difference of scores are obtained as follow,

Student Beloved’s photo Control photo Difference
1 1487.8 1487.2 0.6
2 1329.4 1328.1 1.3
3 1407.9 1405.9 2
4 1236.1 1234 2.1
5 1299.8 1298.2 1.6
6 1447.2 1444.7 2.5
7 1354.1 1354.3 -0.2
8 1204.6 1203.7 0.9
9 1322.3 1320.8 1.5
10 1388.5 1386.8 1.7
Average 1.4
SD 0.7930252
n 10

Average difference Xp 1..4

Std. Dev of difference sn = 0.793

3)

The paired sample t test is performed as follow,

The t statistic is obtained using the formula,

XD 1.4 0,793 5.583 10 t = sp n

The P-value for the t-statistic is obtained from t-distribution table for degree of freedom = n -1 = 9.

P-value 0.0003

4)

P-value 0.0003<a0.05

Since the P-value id less than significance level = 0.05 at 5% significance level. The null hypothesis is rejected. Hence we can conclude that there is significant difference in both treatment score

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
A team of researchers examined the brain systems involved in human romantic love. One issue was...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Using the book, write another paragraph or two: write 170 words: Q: Compare the assumptions of...

    Using the book, write another paragraph or two: write 170 words: Q: Compare the assumptions of physician-centered and collaborative communication. How is the caregiver’s role different in each model? How is the patient’s role different? Answer: Physical-centered communication involves the specialists taking control of the conversation. They decide on the topics of discussion and when to end the process. The patient responds to the issues raised by the caregiver and acts accordingly. On the other hand, Collaborative communication involves a...

  • Evaluate the arical writ the response in which you state your agreement or disagreement with writer...

    Evaluate the arical writ the response in which you state your agreement or disagreement with writer up un these questions guidelines 1) can empathy lead us astrary? how 2) our heart will always go out to the baby in the well, its a measure of our humanity. but empathy will have to yield to reason if humanity is to have a future can empathy yield to reason? how? thank you The Baby in the Well: The Case against Empathy* -Paul...

  • Hi there! I need to compare two essay into 1 essay, and make it interesting and...

    Hi there! I need to compare two essay into 1 essay, and make it interesting and choose couple topics which im going to talk about in my essay FIRST ESSAY “Teaching New Worlds/New Words” bell hooks Like desire, language disrupts, refuses to be contained within boundaries. It speaks itself against our will, in words and thoughts that intrude, even violate the most private spaces of mind and body. It was in my first year of college that I read Adrienne...

  • Please read the article bellow and discuss the shift in the company's approach to genetic analysis....

    Please read the article bellow and discuss the shift in the company's approach to genetic analysis. Please also discuss what you think about personal genomic companies' approaches to research. Feel free to compare 23andMe's polices on research with another company's. Did you think the FDA was right in prohibiting 23andMe from providing health information? These are some sample talking points to get you thinking about the ethics of genetic research in the context of Big Data. You don't have to...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT