Case study: Negotiation-Porto Seller’s Information - Technutronics Brad Tennant, Sales Manager for Technutronics, was developing a strategy for a negotiation session to be held with Gerald Stecklen, a buyer at Porto Corporation. Mr. Stecklen requested the meeting to discuss the quotation submitted by Technutronics for New Prod, a newly designed component. Brad’s company submitted the quotation for New Prod in response to a request for quotation of 200,000 units plus a possible follow-on order of up to 200,000 units (Exhibit 1S). Working with the Engineering and Manufacturing staffs, Brad developed an estimate of manufacturing and tooling costs (Exhibit 2S). The process required to produce the component was unique and somewhat complex. Therefore, quality control requirements for the part were quite involved. Furthermore, if material or equipment problems occurred, an additional $0.60 to $0.70 per unit would be required to produce the part at a level that satisfied the buyer’s requirements. Additional tooling might also be required beyond the quoted tooling charge of $40,000. However, Brad wanted to keep tooling charges to a minimum. The Porto business would be beneficial to Technutronics since they were operating at 75% capacity. Porto was also a long-time customer. The contract would amount to approximately $1,000,000 plus a possible addition of $1,000,000 if the additional 200,000 units were realized. Estimated direct costs to produce the component were $2.71 (raw material + direct engineering + direct labor) of the $4.68 total cost to produce. Brad wanted to establish a per unit selling price that would cover all direct costs and significantly contribute to fixed costs and profit. Furthermore, he needed to consider the quality cost contingencies. After some discussion by the management committee and a review of estimated costs for the part, a quotation was agreed upon. The quality cost contingencies were included and the possible tooling cost increases ignored ($4.68 + $ 0.70). A profit percentage of 10% was added ($0.54). Brad and his controller decided to quote $5.90 per unit plus $40,000 for tooling. Brad felt this bid to be competitive with other firms. The manufacturing manager informed Brad he would make additional effort to develop statistical process control methods to highlight quality problems. Brad realized that the use of statistical methods could help reduce direct costs over time if Technutronics was successful in identifying and eliminating the sources of variability within the process. In addition, there were learning curve considerations for New Prod. However, Brad did not 2 include any estimation of learning effects in the bid. Typically, items such as New Prod have a 90% learning curve. Brad’s task was to develop his negotiation strategy and plan. He knew the contract was important to Technutronics, but they could not sustain a loss. He also knew that Porto did not possess the manufacturing capabilities for the part. The company had no option but to subcontract the component. Brad also knew that other suppliers were anxious for this business. Exhibit 1B Expected New Prod Delivery Schedule Month Quantity December 20,000 January 20,000 February 25,000 March 15,000 April 15,000 May 15,000 June 10,000 July 10,000 August 15,000 September 20,000 October 20,000 November 15,000 Total 200,000 Payment terms: Net 25 Transportation Terms: Sellers Plant, Freight Collect Using Location: Detroit, Michigan 3 Exhibit 2S Sellers Estimated Cost (For 200,000 Units) Total Cost Unit Cost Raw Material: $497,000 $2.488 (0.4405 lbs./unit x $5.648/lb.) Direct Engineering Labor: Electrical Engineer $17.50/hr. x 80 hrs. $ 1,400 Micro Associate Engineer $11.25/hr x 1200 hrs. $13,500 Micro Technician $10.50/hr. X 600 hrs. $ 6,300 Engineering Overhead: $21,000 x 125% $26,250 $0.131 Direct Manufacturing Labor: Machine Shop $10.65/hr. x 1080 hrs. $11,502 Mechanical Assembly $6.00/hr. x 2940 hrs. $17,640 Assembly Supervisor $11.55/hr. x 500 hours $5,775 Production Manager $14.50/hr. x 500 hours $7,250 Manufacturing Overhead: $42,167 x 250% $105,418 $0.5272 SUBTOTAL $692,885 General and Administrative Costs: $692,885 x 35% $242,510 $1.2126 TOTAL $935,395 $4.678 1. Prepare to negotiate a contract with Porto. Identify the key issues and the range of your position on those issues. Remember that price is not the only variable subject to negotiation. 2. What do you think will be the most important issue(s) to the buyer? 3. What do you believe is the highest price that Porto is willing to pay for New Prod? What is the lowest price you are willing to sell New Prod? (This defines your negotiating range on the price issue). 4. Conduct the negotiation with the buyer. You may share as little or as much information with the seller during the negotiation as you desire. Be sure to record any agreement you reach in the form of a contract.
We need at least 10 more requests to produce the answer.
0 / 10 have requested this problem solution
The more requests, the faster the answer.
1. Establish a buyer's negotiating position and plan using the information in the case (It is suggested you answer questions 2 to 5 before preparing your plan), and include: a. Negotiation objectives. b. Identify two (2) or three (3) key issues to be negotiated and define the minimum, maximum and target positions for each. c. Identify important facts from buyer's point of view. d. Identify buyer's and seller's strengths and weaknesses. e. Identify buyer's and seller's needs. f. List other...
help with these exercises please 3 Your Company makes 8000 units of a component part. At this level of activity, the cost per part is: Direct materials $3.00 Direct labor $4.00 Variable manufacturing overhead $2.00 Fixed manufacturing overhead $6.00 Total cost per part $15.00 An outside supplier has offered to sell the parts to Your Co. for $12 each. If Your Co. accepts this offer, it will be able to increase production of another product and earn an additional $24000...
Purchase Negotiation Case: Common Information This simulation involves negotiating the purchase of an automotive fabric. The following information is common to all groups participating in the negotiation: There are four potential manufacturers of textile products. These include the following: Athena Corp. - Annual sales of approx. $ 40 million dollars, located in Bowling Green, Kentucky.. Cybaris Corp. - Annual sales of approx. $ 50 million dollars, located in Charlotte, NC. Medusa Corp. - Annual sales of approx. $ 20 million...
ABC Corporation manufactures lamps. It has set up the following standards per finished unit for direct materials and direct manufacturing labor: Direct materials: 2 lb. at $7.50 per lb. $15.00 Direct manufacturing labor: 0.3 hour at $90 per hour $27.00 The number of finished units budgeted for January 2017 was 20,000; 15000 units were actually produced. Actual results in January 2017 were as follows: Direct materials used: 2.2 lb. x 15,000 = 33,000 lbs @ $7.00 / lb. Direct manufacturing...
pls help!!!thx ABC Corporation manufactures lamps. It has set up the following standards per finished unit for direct materials and direct manufacturing labor: Direct materials: 2 lb. at $7.50 per lb. $15.00 Direct manufacturing labor: 0.3 hour at $90 per hour $27.00 The number of finished units budgeted for January 2017 was 20,000; 15000 units were actually produced. Actual results in January 2017 were as follows: Direct materials used: 2.2 lb. x 15,000 = 33,000 lbs @ $7.00/lb. Direct manufacturing...
pls help!!!thx ABC Corporation manufactures lamps. It has set up the following standards per finished unit for direct materials and direct manufacturing labor: Direct materials: 2 lb. at $7.50 per lb. $15.00 Direct manufacturing labor: 0.3 hour at $90 per hour $27.00 The number of finished units budgeted for January 2017 was 20,000; 15000 units were actually produced. Actual results in January 2017 were as follows: Direct materials used: 2.2 lb. x 15,000 = 33,000 lbs @ $7.00/lb. Direct manufacturing...
Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Knickknack, Inc. manufactures two products: Odds and Ends. The firm uses a single, plantwide overhead rate based on direct-labor hours. Production and product-costing data are as follows: Odds $ Production quantity Direct material Direct labor (not including setup time) Manufacturing overhead 40 20 (2 hr. at $15) 96 (2 hr. at $48) 166 Ends 5,000 units $ 60 15 (3 hr. at $15) 144 (3 hr. at $48) $...
Required information The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Kitchen King's Toledo plant manufactures three product lines, all multi-burner, ceramic cook tops. The plant's three product models are the Regular (REG), the Advanced (ADV), and the Gourmet (GMT). Until recently, the plant used a job- order product-costing system, with manufacturing overhead applied on the basis of direct-labor hours. The following table displays the basic data upon which the traditional costing system was based REG ADV GMT Planned annual...
Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Knickknack, Inc. manufactures two products: Odds and Ends. The firm uses a single, plantwide overhead rate based on direct-labor hours. Production and product-costing data are as follows: Odds $ Production quantity Direct material Direct labor (not including setup time) Manufacturing overhead 40 20 (2 hr. at $15) 96 (2 hr. at $48) 166 Ends 5,000 units $ 60 15 (3 hr. at $15) 144 (3 hr. at $48) $...
[The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Knickknack, Inc. manufactures two products: Odds and Ends. The firm uses a single, plantwide overhead rate based on direct-labor hours. Production and product-costing data are as follows: Odds Ends Production quantity 1,000 units 5,000 units Direct material $ 40 $ 60 Direct labor (not including setup time) 30 (2 hr. at $15) 45 (3 hr. at $15) Manufacturing overhead 96 (2 hr. at $48) 144 (3 hr. at $48) Total cost...