A market research firm used a sample of individuals to rate the purchase potential of a particular product before and after the individuals saw a new television commercial about the product. The purchase potential ratings were based on a 0 to 10 scale, with higher values indicating a higher purchase potential. The null hypothesis stated that the mean rating "after" would be less than or equal to the mean rating "before." Rejection of this hypothesis would show that the commercial improved the mean purchase potential rating. Use
α = 0.05
and the following data to test the hypothesis and comment on the value of the commercial.
Individual | Purchase Rating | |
---|---|---|
After | Before | |
1 | 6 | 5 |
2 | 6 | 5 |
3 | 7 | 7 |
4 | 4 | 3 |
5 | 3 | 7 |
6 | 9 | 8 |
7 | 7 | 5 |
8 | 6 | 6 |
Let be
the true mean rating "before"
and
be the true mean
rating "after" the individuals saw a new television commercial
about the product.
The null hypothesis stated that the mean rating "after" would be less than or equal to the mean rating "before." Rejection of this hypothesis would show that the commercial improved the mean purchase potential rating.
That is we want to test the following hypotheses
Since the same set of individuals are used to collect the before and after ratings, this is a paired sample and hence we will use the test for difference between the means for dependent (paired) samples.
Let
be the mean improvement in the rating measured as the difference
between rating after and rating before viewing the commercial.
We can rewrite the hypotheses as
From the sample calculate the difference between the rating as below
individual | Purchase Rating | ||
After | Before | Difference (after - before) (d) | |
1 | 6 | 5 | 1 |
2 | 6 | 5 | 1 |
3 | 7 | 7 | 0 |
4 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
5 | 3 | 7 | -4 |
6 | 9 | 8 | 1 |
7 | 7 | 5 | 2 |
8 | 6 | 6 | 0 |
Next we calculate the following
n=8 is the sample size
The sample mean difference is
The sample standard deviation of difference is
We estimate the unknown population standard deviation as
The standard error of mean difference is
is the hypothesized value of mean difference (from the null
hypothesis)
We will use t test as the sample size is less than 30 and we do not know the population standard deviation.
the test statistics is
The degrees of freedom for t statistics is n-1=8-1=7
This is a right tailed test (from the alternative hypothesis
having ">"). The critical value of t is such that the area under
the right tail is 0.05. The critical value of t for alpha=0.05 is
Using table df=7 and area under the right tail=0.05 we get the critical value of t=1.895
We will reject the null hypothesis if the test statistics is greater than the critical value.
Here the test statistics is 0.386 and it is less than the critical value 1.895. Hence we do not reject the null hypothesis.
We conclude that at 5% level of significance, there is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that he commercial improved the mean purchase potential rating.
The new commercial does not seem to improve the purchase potential of this particular product.
A market research firm used a sample of individuals to rate the purchase potential of a...
A market research firm used a sample of individuals to rate the purchase potential of a particular product before and after the individuals saw a new television commercial about the product. The purchase potential ratings were based on a 0 to 10 scale, with higher values indicating a higher purchase potential. The null hypothesis stated that the mean rating "after would be less than or equal to the mean rating "before." Rejection of this hypothesis would show that the commercial...
A market research firm used a sample of individuals to rate the purchase potential of a particular product before and after the individuals saw a new television commercial about the product. The purchase potential ratings were based on a 0 to 10 scale, with higher values indicating a higher purchase potential. The null hypothesis stated that the mean rating "after" would be less than or equal to the mean rating "before." Rejection of this hypothesis would show that the commercial...
A market research firm used a sample of individuals to rate the purchase potential of a particular product before and after the individuals saw a new television commercial about the product. The purchase potential ratings were based on a 0 to 10 scale, with higher values indicating a higher purchase potential. The null hypothesis stated that the mean rating "after" would be less than or equal to the mean rating "before." Rejection of this hypothesis would show that the commercial...
A market research firm used a sample of individuals to rate the purchase potential of a particular product before and after the individuals saw a new television commercial about the product. The purchase potential ratings were based on a 0 to 10 scale, with higher values indicating a higher purchase potential. The null hypothesis stated that the mean rating "after" would be less than or equal to the mean rating "before." Rejection of this hypothesis would show that the commercial...
The average annaal cest (ecluding tution, room, board, books and fees) to atend a public college takes nearly a third of the arnual inceme ef a typical family with college-age children (Money, Aori 2012). At private colleges, the average annual cost equal to about 60% of the 12. typeal family's ncome. The fallowing random samoes show ee rmai t of attencing poate and pubie colege, Ota 13. ar inthousands of dollars. Click on the webfhile logo to reference the data...
Periodically, Merrill Lynch customers are asked to evaluate Merill Lynch financial consultants and services. Higher ratings on the client satisfactian survey indicate better service with 7 the maximum service rating. Independent samples of service ratings for two financial consultants are summarized here. Consultant A has 10 years of experience, whereas consultant B has 1 year of experience. Use a 05 and test to see whether the consaltant with more experience has the higher population mean service rating Excel File: data10-17.xs...
A market research firm wants to pilot test children’s toys in stores. They collect data on attitude ratings (higher scores reflect more liking) for three different toys and find the following results: Legos (M = 5.5; N = 10), a football (M = 4.5; N = 10), and a NERF gun (M = 6.0; N = 10). They also calculated the between-group and within-group sum of squares (SSB = 262.2; SSW =1220.4). Use a one-way ANOVA (where α = .05)...
Prior to taking an aerobic lesson, each of the 12 health-club members is asked to rate the instructor on a scale of 3=excellent; 2=good; and 1=poor. Following the class, each student is again asked to rate the same instructor. Given the following before-and-after ratings, can we conclude that there is a significant improvement in instructor’s rating at α=0.05. students 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Precourse rating 1 3 2 2 2 2 1...
(1) A psychologist would like to examine the relative effectiveness of 3 treatments for mild phobias. A sample of N=12 individuals who display a moderate fear of spiders is obtained. These individuals are randomly assigned (with n=4) to each of the 3 treatments. The dependent variable is a measure of reported fear of spiders after treatment. The data are as follows: (Treatment 1) 0 4 0 4 (Treatment 2) 1 5 4 2 (Treatment 3) 8 5 6 9 a....
In a study on attraction, suppose subjects were asked to rate pictures of females and males taken before and after a face-lift. Subjects rated the pictures on a number of variables. The total attractiveness ratings are given below, with higher numbers meaning higher attractiveness. You are asked to test whether face-lifts improve the looks of the subjects. Subject: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Before: 22 24 26 20 23 22...