Question

Calculate the system reliability for the system below. To help you reason this one out, feel...

Calculate the system reliability for the system below. To help you reason this one out, feel free to redraw the system each time you calculate a combined reliability.B R=.88 B R=.88 DA R=.99 R=.98 C R=.90 CR=.90
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

In life information examination and quickened life testing information investigation, just as other testing exercises, one of the essential destinations is to get an actual existence conveyance that depicts the occasions to-disappointment of a part, subassembly, get together or framework. This examination depends on the season of fruitful task or time-to-disappointment information of the thing (segment), either under use conditions or from quickened life tests.

For any life information investigation, the investigator picks a time when not any more point by point data about the object of examination is known or should be considered. By then, the investigator regards the object of examination as a "black box." The determination of this dimension (e.g., segment, subassembly, get together or framework) decides the detail of the resulting investigation.

In framework unwavering quality examination, one builds a "Framework" show from these part models. At the end of the day in framework unwavering quality investigation we are worried about the development of a model (life dissemination) that speaks to the occasions to-disappointment of the whole framework dependent on the existence circulations of the segments, subassemblies as well as gatherings ("secret elements") from which it is made, as outlined in the figure beneath.

Acquiring a framework pdf from the pdfs of the segments.

To achieve this, the connections between segments are considered and choices about the selection of segments can be made to enhance or advance the general framework dependability, practicality and additionally accessibility. There are numerous particular purposes behind taking a gander at segment information to assess the general framework dependability. A standout amongst the most vital is that by and large it is less demanding and more affordable to test segments/subsystems instead of whole frameworks. Numerous different advantages of the framework unwavering quality examination approach likewise exist and will be introduced all through this reference.

Frameworks

A framework is an accumulation of parts, subsystems or potentially congregations masterminded to a particular structure so as to accomplish wanted capacities with adequate execution and unwavering quality. The sorts of parts, their amounts, their characteristics and the way in which they are organized inside the framework directly affect the framework's unwavering quality. The connection between a framework and its segments is regularly misconstrued or distorted. For instance, the accompanying articulation isn't substantial: All of the segments in a framework have a 90% unwavering quality at a given time, along these lines the dependability of the framework is 90% for that time. Shockingly, poor comprehension of the connection between a framework and its constituent segments can result in articulations like this being acknowledged as authentic, when as a general rule they are false.

Dependability Block Diagrams (RBDs)

Square charts are generally utilized in building and science and exist in a wide range of structures. They can likewise be utilized to depict the interrelation between the segments and to characterize the framework. At the point when utilized in this form, the square graph is then alluded to as a dependability square outline (RBD).

An unwavering quality square chart is a graphical portrayal of the parts of the framework and how they are dependability astute related (associated). It ought to be noticed this may vary from how the segments are physically associated. A RBD of a rearranged PC framework with a repetitive fan arrangement is appeared as follows.

A straightforward dependability square graph.

RBDs are built out of squares. The squares are associated with bearing lines that speak to the unwavering quality connection between the squares.

A square is normally spoken to in the chart by a square shape. In an unwavering quality square outline, such squares speak to the part, subsystem or get together at its picked discovery level. The accompanying figure demonstrates two squares, one speaking to a resistor and one speaking to a PC.

Squares speaking to a resistor and a PC.

It is feasible for each square in a specific RBD to be spoken to by its very own dependability square graph, contingent upon the dimension of detail being referred to. For instance, in a RBD of a vehicle, the best dimension squares could speak to the real frameworks of the vehicle, as outlined in the figure beneath. Every one of these frameworks could have their very own RBDs in which the squares speak to the subsystems of that specific framework. This could proceed down through numerous dimensions of detail, right down to the dimension of the most fundamental segments (e.g., clasp), if so wanted.

Case of a framework containing various diverse subsystems.

The dimension of granularity or detail that one picks ought to be founded on both the accessibility of information and on the most minimal significant thing idea. To delineate this idea, consider the previously mentioned PC framework appeared. At the point when the PC producer discovers that the hard drive isn't as solid as it ought to be and chooses not to endeavor to enhance the unwavering quality of the current hard drive but instead to get another hard drive provider, at that point the most minimal significant thing is the hard drive. The hard drive provider will at that point have noteworthy things inside the hard drive, etc.

Square Failure Models

Having fragmented an item or process into parts, the initial phase in assessing the unwavering quality of a framework is to get life/occasion information concerning every segment/subsystem (i.e., each square). This data will permit the unwavering quality designer to describe the existence dissemination of every part. Information can be acquired from various sources, including:

In-house unwavering quality tests

Quickened life tests

Field information

Guarantee information

Designing learning

Likeness to earlier structures

Other reference sources

Furthermore, segment life information may likewise be given by the producer or provider of the part/subsystem. When the informational collection has been gotten, the existence dispersion of a part/subsystem can be evaluated utilizing ReliaSoft's Weibull++ or ALTA programming. For instance, consider a resistor that is a piece of a bigger framework to be dissected. Disappointment information for this resistor can be gotten by performing in-house dependability tests and by watching the conduct of that sort of resistor in the field. As appeared as follows, an actual existence dissemination is then fitted to the information and the parameters are gotten. The parameters of that circulation speak to the existence dispersion of that resistor obstruct in the general framework RBD.

Acquiring the disappointment circulation parameters for a part.

Other square properties

In a similar way, different sorts of data can likewise be gotten that can be utilized to characterize other square properties, for example, an opportunity to-fix dispersion (by dissecting the occasions to-fix of each square rather than the occasions to-disappointment), other upkeep necessities, throughput properties, and so forth. These square properties would then be able to be utilized to play out an assortment of examinations on the general framework to anticipate as well as advance the framework's unwavering quality, practicality, accessibility, save parts usage, throughput, and so forth.

Accessible Distributions

Since the disappointment properties of a part are best depicted by measurable conveyances, the most regularly utilized life appropriations are accessible in BlockSim. (For more data about these dispersions, see Life Distributions.) The accessible disseminations are:

1 and 2 parameter exponential dispersions

1, 2 and 3 parameter Weibull dispersions

Blended Weibull dispersion (with 2, 3 or 4 subpopulations)

Ordinary circulation

Lognormal dispersion

Summed up Gamma (i.e., G-Gamma) dispersion

Gamma dispersion

Strategic circulation

Loglogistic dispersion

Gumbel dispersion

Similar circulations are additionally accessible as fix dispersions and in other probabilistic property windows that we will talk about later. The primary figure beneath shows the Block Properties window with the Weibull dissemination alloted as the disappointment conveyance while the second figure represents the Block Properties window with the typical circulation appointed as the fix dispersion.

Disappointment appropriation doled out in the Block Properties window.

Fix appropriation doled out in the Block Properties window.

Framework Reliability Function

In the wake of characterizing the properties of each square in a framework, the squares would then be able to be associated in an unwavering quality savvy way to make a dependability square outline for the framework. The RBD gives a visual portrayal of the manner in which the squares are unwavering quality astute organized. This implies an outline will be made that speaks to the working state (i.e., achievement or disappointment) of the framework as far as the working conditions of its parts. At the end of the day, this outline shows the impact of the achievement or disappointment of a segment on the achievement or disappointment of the framework. For instance, if all segments in a framework must prevail all together for the framework to succeed, the parts will be orchestrated unwavering quality astute in arrangement. In the event that one of two segments must prevail all together for the framework to succeed, those two segments will be orchestrated unwavering quality astute in parallel. RBDs and Analytical System Reliability talks about RBDs and charting techniques.

The unwavering quality astute course of action of parts is straightforwardly identified with the determined numerical depiction of the framework. The numerical portrayal of the framework is the way to the assurance of the unwavering quality of the framework. Indeed, the framework's unwavering quality capacity is that scientific depiction (got utilizing probabilistic strategies) and it characterizes the framework dependability as far as the part reliabilities. The outcome is a scientific articulation that depicts the unwavering quality of the framework as an element of time dependent on the dependability elements of its parts. Measurable Background, RBDs and Analytical System Reliability and Time-Dependent System Reliability (Analytical) examine this further. These sections likewise offer determinations of required conditions and present precedents.

Non-Repairable and Repairable Systems

Frameworks can be quality

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Calculate the system reliability for the system below. To help you reason this one out, feel...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Note: but use λi =0.000249 and System reliability at time equal to 1132

    Note: but use λi =0.000249 and System reliability at time equal to 1132 4.1 For the circuit below, assume the reliability of each circuit R(xexp(, and i , Minimal path sets b. Minimal cut sets c. MTTF. d. Reliability of the system at 1000 h X4 4.1 For the circuit below, assume the reliability of each circuit R(xexp(, and i , Minimal path sets b. Minimal cut sets c. MTTF. d. Reliability of the system at 1000 h X4

  • Problem: 14 pointsl Given the Reliability Block Diagram below of a system with 3 different compon...

    please solve only 1.2 and 1.3 dont solve 1.1 thanks Problem: 14 pointsl Given the Reliability Block Diagram below of a system with 3 different components in series, each with a time to failure distribution and a baseline 3-year reliability, which is the current warranty period for the system Part A Weibull, shape β-2 R(3 years) 0.75 Part B Expon R(3 years) 0.70 Part C Exponential R(3 years) 0.80 1.1) Determine the system reliability at 3-year. Management wants to improve...

  • Question Help The principle of redundancy is used when system reliability is improved through redundant or...

    Question Help The principle of redundancy is used when system reliability is improved through redundant or backup components. Assume that a student's alarm clock has a 6.7% daily failure rate. Complete parts (a) through (d) below. a. What is the probability that the student's alarm clock will not work on the morning of an important final exam? (Round to three decimal places as needed) b. If the student has two such alarm clocks, what is the probability that they both...

  • Question Help The principle of redundancy is used when system reliability is improved through redundant or...

    Question Help The principle of redundancy is used when system reliability is improved through redundant or backup components. Assume that a student's alarm clock has a 9.2% daily failure rate Complete parts (a) through (d) below. What is the probably that the student's alarm clock will not work on the morning of an important final exam? Round to three decimal places as needed) b. I the student has two suchalarm clocks, what is the probability that they both tall on...

  • Question Help The principle of redundancy is used when system reliability is improved through redundant or...

    Question Help The principle of redundancy is used when system reliability is improved through redundant or backup components. Assume that a student's alarm clock has a 19.5% daily failure rate. Complete parts (a) through (d) below. a. What is the probability that the student's alarm clock will not work on the morning of an important final exam? (Round to three decimal places as needed.) b. If the student has two such alarm clocks, what is the probability that they both...

  • please help and the answer involves redrawing 4 circuits!! For the one below you will have...

    please help and the answer involves redrawing 4 circuits!! For the one below you will have to redraw 4 circuits based on ON/OFF conditions for each diode (i.e. ON/ON, ON/OFF, OFF/ON, and OFF/OFF states for diodes D, and D2 respectively) R1 Vin

  • Please help me with this program.You are to write a C++ program that will read in...

    Please help me with this program.You are to write a C++ program that will read in up to 15 students with student information and grades. Your program will compute an average and print out certain reports. Format: The information for each student is on separate lines of input. The first data will be the student�s ID number, next line is the students name, next the students classification, and the last line are the 10 grades where the last grade is...

  • A national survey asked people, "How often do you eat out for dinner. (a) Construct a...

    A national survey asked people, "How often do you eat out for dinner. (a) Construct a relative frequency distribution of the data. instead of at home?" The frequencies were as follows. Complete parts (a) through (9) Response Relative Frequency Never Response Frequency Rarely Never 356 Sometimes Rarely 461 Most of the time Sometimes 929 Most of the time Always 410 Always 39 (Round to three decimal places as needed.) (b) What percentage of respondents answered "Always? DOOD (Round to one...

  • One of the main reason for closed loop system is increase the error to infinity i...

    One of the main reason for closed loop system is increase the error to infinity i need the steps to fet the final answer Window Help ELE 2603 LO3 Final control element Q-Sep ELE 2603 LO4 Process Control Q- control Transitions Animations Slide Show Review View Perpetua (Body) EE 18 A- B abe X AV. Convert to SmartArt Picture Format AC What is the set point? Y Fil 30 C OSolid fill Gradient What is % steady state error? (2/30)...

  • 2012 Calculate the final equivalent resistance between terminals A and B? Ensure that you draw out...

    2012 Calculate the final equivalent resistance between terminals A and B? Ensure that you draw out each step. You should follow the process: a. Identify the parallel resistors using their labels and the parallel symbol notation (e.g. Rx = R1 || Rs), then work out the equivalent values for the parallel resistance(s), using your designated labels (e.g. Rx = 492). b. Redraw the circuit with the parallel resistors replaced by their equivalent resistance(s). Hint: replacing parallel resistors does not remove...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT