Question

Case Analysis: The Decision Making Process For this assignment, you will write a case analysis using, 3M - The First 110 Years.

Write a comprehensive case analysis covering the following:

1. The context of the decision making processes, including for example the goals, activities, history or culture of the organization; the complexity and special features of the task or problem; the major stakeholders of the decisions.

2. The main phases or activities of the decision-making process, including for example the background leading up to the problem situation; problem recognition; development and evaluation of alternatives; selection of alternative; and outcome of the decision. Where possible, analyze the information seeking and information use behaviors in the decision-making process.

3. Analyze your case using one or more of the models introduced this week. You may also introduce other theoretical perspectives/cases to enrich your analysis. Show how these models/perspectives provide insight into your case.

4. Assess the overall quality of the decision-making process. Identify its strengths and limitations. Suggest ways of improving the process.

Answer 1

When settling on a choice, an association needs to guarantee that they comprehend the issue great and have sufficient data about it. This data can be produced through research or notwithstanding doing an interview procedure. (Hahneman, 2010)

The principle stages or exercises of basic leadership

Issue acknowledgment

This is the initial phase in the basic leadership process. It is produced from the disappointments that an association encounters. The procedure of basic leadership begins when an organization or association is prepared to make a move to take care of the issue. For the situation investigation of the Shell Company there is the disclosure of lack of common sense and oversight in the organization.

The Shell Company had every one of the assets to see the issue from the activists ambushing the Shell Company. The consultants of the organization would have seen the Greenpeace expectation to uncover the ecological harm of the Shell with its dangerous buildups in the capacity tank. (Bazerman, 2004)

Issue improvement

In issue improvement, an association or an organization expedites the issue the table, examinations it , looking it in all viewpoints . They take a gander at the reason, what made the organization not see the issue coming and the most ideal ways the circumstance can be taken care of. The Shell was too heedless to even consider seeing the dissent coming simply like some other organization would be gotten ignorant in various occasions.

Assessment of options

This is the third stage in the basic leadership process. It includes the correlation of the options that could have been utilized in order to stay away from the issue. For the Shell, the administration and the counselors would have gone an additional mile to watch out for the tree hugger reaction on their organization knowing great that what they were managing would effectively contaminate nature. Also, the Shell would have created approaches to arrange the buildup from the capacity tank I averting ecological contamination.

Determination of choices

In determination the choices, the Company ought not first think about any of the option as the ideal choice. Each option ought to be taken a gander at in an unexpected way. The Shell the executives would have assembled dire conferences which include conceptualizing to discover elective answers for the issue they encountered. This would require more research to social occasion development like what made the Greenpeace snare the Shell on the grounds that the Shell was wanting to garbage the Spar.

There are numerous arrangements that can be created, huge numbers of them will in general face restriction and such are disposed of in order to at long last settle on the serviceable arrangements. A few arrangements should be endangered eventually in basic leadership.

Result of the choice

The result of the choice is settled on when the option is tried and demonstrates to work. An official conclusion ought to be of value and it must have greatest help from the administrative staff. The guides of Shell, the administrative board of trustees need to settle on one end that they will deal with to attempt kill obliviousness in the organization's working.

There ought to be created a connection of correspondence arrange, inside the association as well as with different associations that work inseparably with the association. This will empower agreeable workplace.