Question

How can an Iowa Court have jurisdiction over a New Jersey defendant?

How can an Iowa Court have jurisdiction over a New Jersey defendant?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

In lowa court Judges may be more in favour of a defendant that is the more liberl will be judges in lowa Courts.

It may be the factor of cost for the defendent it it is comparitively lesser costlier to hire an advocate(lawyer) in lowa court.

The Lowa Court allows a New Jersey Defendant is also of some reasons such it is based on the nature of claim like the "Place where it occured" "Where the Parties live in"

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
How can an Iowa Court have jurisdiction over a New Jersey defendant?
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • two methods by which a state court may establish personal jurisdiction over a defendant in a...

    two methods by which a state court may establish personal jurisdiction over a defendant in a civil case

  • 1. Generally, State A may exercise "long arm" jurisdiction over a defendant located in State B...

    1. Generally, State A may exercise "long arm" jurisdiction over a defendant located in State B if the defendant: a. uses a product produced in State A. b. once resided in State A. c. made a contract in State A. d. has relatives in State A. (14) 2. Torts are civil cases, not criminal cases. True False (18) 3. The pleadings in a lawsuit include: a. the complaint and answer b. the depositions. c. written interrogatories. d. evidence presented in...

  • 38) In 2002, Australia's highest court ruled on a defamation case in which an Australian citizen...

    38) In 2002, Australia's highest court ruled on a defamation case in which an Australian citizen claimed to have defamed by a Dow Jones article published on the defendant's website. The court found that the citizen was des in A) and jurisdiction over Dow Jones was established because under American law, the defendant's website and sufficiently established minimum contacts, creating jurisdiction. B) but jurisdiction over Dow Jones couldn't be established because the defendant's servers wer had been uploaded in the...

  • International Shoe Corporation’s defense was not valid. A court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction is constitutional when...

    International Shoe Corporation’s defense was not valid. A court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction is constitutional when a defendant has minimum contacts with the state where a lawsuit is brought such that notions of fair play and substantial justice would not be offended. For the purposes of personal jurisdiction, a corporation is normally subject to the jurisdiction in the state in which is was incorporated, has its principal office and is doing business. Under the long arm statute, a court can...

  • Background/Facts: Determining jurisdiction in the courts can be confusing and complicated, but it is an important...

    Background/Facts: Determining jurisdiction in the courts can be confusing and complicated, but it is an important legal doctrine that businesses cannot ignore. Jurisdiction can affect business operations and determine business decisions, such as where the business is located and where and how to advertise and market the business. Where there are questions about possible jurisdiction in the courts, it is advisable for businesses to consult an attorney. TLG's client, Clean, is facing other litigation and needs advice. Clean is located...

  • Court of 7. The federal appeals court for the State of California is known formally as...

    Court of 7. The federal appeals court for the State of California is known formally as the Appeals. Court of 8. The federal appeals court for the State of New Jersey is known formally as the Appeals. 9. An appellate court can overturn the decision of a trial court based on error if it finds any of the following: a trial court made a mistake in applying the law, the jury's factual findings were not reasonably supported by the evidence...

  • Diversity Jurisdiction Homes Away from Home 6. Carella (New York) collides with McGec (Florida) during a...

    Diversity Jurisdiction Homes Away from Home 6. Carella (New York) collides with McGec (Florida) during a car chase in New York City. Carella is disabled in the accident, retires to Florida, and sues McGee in a federal district court in Florida. Is the suit proper? Corporate Diversity 8. Carella (New York) sues Underworld, Inc., incorporated in Delaware, doing business in every state, with its principal place of business in Florida. Suit is brought in the federal district court for the...

  • QUESTION 9 Californians can vote to confirm or dismiss (through a recall election) state Supreme Court...

    QUESTION 9 Californians can vote to confirm or dismiss (through a recall election) state Supreme Court justices. This reduces what? a judicial independence b. confidence in the court c. representation of the people by the judiciary d. the right of the majority to rule QUESTION 10 The size of the U.S. Supreme Court is set by a. Congress b. the American Bar Association. c. the president. d. state legislatures. QUESTION 11 law. When a private individual brings a suit against...

  • The defendant in State v. Cunningham, the owner and administrator of a residential care facility, housed 30 to 37 mental...

    The defendant in State v. Cunningham, the owner and administrator of a residential care facility, housed 30 to 37 mentally ill, intellectually disabled, and senior residents. The Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals conducted various surveys at the defendant’s facility between October 1989 and May 1990. All of the surveys except for one resulted in a $50 daily fine assessed against the defendant for violations of the regulations. On August 16, 1990, a grand jury filed an indictment charging the...

  • How much involvement should a victim have in a criminal court proceeding? Should a victim be...

    How much involvement should a victim have in a criminal court proceeding? Should a victim be able to read a victim impact statement? Whose rights are more important in a criminal proceeding, the criminal defendant or the victim? Explain.

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT