Question

Write a introduction Paragraph for this paper

Foundations of Global Business

As an organization that spends significant time in U.S. government contracts, CACI International works all throughout the world in an assortment of jobs, every one of which fluctuates in size as per what the administration is hoping to achieve. Three noteworthy areas where they work are the United States, the United Kingdom, and Afghanistan. Afghanistan is an individual from the IMF and the World Bank; nonetheless, it isn't yet an individual from the WTO. Despite the fact that Afghanistan is an individual from the IMF and World Bank, the wild security circumstance in the nation in the course of recent years has seen its enrollment to the two associations fall all through movement (Salazar, 2015). The United Kingdom and the United States are both undeniable individuals from the IMF, the World Bank, and the WTO.

Explicitly with Afghanistan, I feel that the administration thinks that it’s difficult to meet the majority of the required rules of these three associations. This is a blend of an absence of government control into the provincial zones of the nation in general, just as the turbulent security circumstance in the nation at the present time (Barfield, 2010). In any case, I imagine that the following five to ten years will be a defining moment somehow for Afghanistan's global exchange nearness the world. I do trust that the United States and the United Kingdom pursue the rules for these three noteworthy associations.

The United States and The United Kingdom have two political and legal executive frameworks that are not constantly straightforward; in any case, in examination with different nations, for example, Afghanistan, their straightforwardness is great and seems to empower globalization. As the two of them have strong universal financial exchange that keeps on slanting upwards, any reasonable person would agree that their institutional structures do empower globalization on an expansive scale.

I believe that the United States and the United Kingdom both have comparative arrangements concerning administration, focused markets, property rights, and debasement. Be that as it may, it is not necessarily the case that their approaches are totally compelling. For instance, across the board debasement all through the United States' money-related area in the mid 2000s, including the Enron embarrassment, had resonating negative budgetary impacts far and wide. This brought about more tightly budgetary detailing confinements as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which had an impact that was felt in the U.S., yet additionally in its outside exchange accomplices.

Then again, Afghanistan, as a creating exchange nation, does not have as solid of approaches as the U.S. furthermore, the U.K. Concerning administration, Afghanistan is attempting to guarantee that its very own administering measures reach out outside of the state house of Kabul, significantly less to the remote zones of the nation. Concerning aggressive markets. Afghanistan does not have a viable control technique to guarantee that property rights are ensured.

CACI International is a maker of chiefly benefits through filling U.S. government gets that require specific HR. The transcendent shopper of CACI's administrations is the Department of Defense; be that as it may, there are additionally numerous different divisions of the U.S. government that use the organization's administrations. CACI International's yields are basically sold locally. In any case, the organization does likewise work with some select U.S. accomplices. Concurrences with the U.S. government do administer which nations CACI can work with, which to some degree constrains their ability to trade their administrations around the world.

As the organization's primary fare is mastery, levies are a component that does not vigorously influence the business. Be that as it may, there are various non-levy boundaries that become an integral factor when CACI sends out a portion of its HR to work on the overall stage. A case of a non-duty boundary would be that, in numerous nations, CACI representatives regularly face substantial non-occupant imposes that make it difficult for the organization to discover faculty that are eager to pay such overwhelming fines on their pay. Despite the fact that this factor can change intensely relying upon nation, it is to a great extent observed as a route for those nations to enlist residential representatives, instead of worldwide transplants, which CACI has practical experience in getting.

I trust that CACI International would profit progressively under a reciprocal or provincial exchanging coalition than a multilateral exchange advancement, for example, the WTO. The primary purpose behind this is CACI, being an organization that spends significant time in sending out HR, could probably tailor the terms of a respective or territorial exchanging coalition than it could with a greater multilateral exchanging association. On the off chance that CACI could be an individual from a territorial exchanging alliance that explicitly addressed human work specialists being exchanged among nations associated with the arrangement, at that point they could receive a more prominent reward from this.

Global Business Environment

CACI is an American IT company, mainly dealing with information solutions. The company majorly has its offices in USA and UK, but it deals with clients from various countries like Japan, China, India, Germany, etc. Given below is the analysis of cultural dimensions of USA, based on Hofstede Cultural dimensions: Power Distance: America values equality and participatory form of doing business. All are considered equal and there is not much hierarchy. Organizations also have flat structures. Every employee of the organization has equal rights of expressing his concerns. Masculinity: America stands high on the masculinity quotient of cultural dimensions. Americans love being competitive and are always ready to take challenges.

The overall society aspires to become achievers. Success is what matters the most to them, the path followed to achieve success is not considered important. Individualism: USA is highly individualistic country. The nation prefers nuclear family than joint ones. Preference is given to family over others. Loyalty is also biased towards personal favorite entities in business. Long Term Orientation: Americans live in the present and care very less about the future. They believe in attainment of short-term goals and do not worry much about the long-term objectives. Uncertainty avoidance: USA is a risk-taking country. They like to grab opportunities, without giving much considerations to the outcome. They accept change with open hands.

Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions for Japan: As per the Hofstede’s Cultural dimensions, the culture of Japan is characterized by intermediate power-distance score of fifty-four (Hofstede, 2019). Japan is a type of a hierarchical society. There is awareness about power play and social positions but the same is applied in business as the last resort. Japanese are quite slow decision makers as each decision needs to be approved by every hierarchical layer in business before its implementation. Moderate individualism: Japanese culture can be considered to be moderately group oriented. The people take special care not to hurt the overall harmony of society. The Japanese criticize in indirect way as they try to avoid any kind of conflicting situations in group. Very high masculinity: Japan can be considered to be one of the most masculine culture in the world. They are highly competitive; achievement and success is celebrated quite effectively. Japanese do not like that their weaknesses get recognized in public, so they work really hard on every aspect, so as to convert their weakness to their strength. Very high uncertainty avoidance: Japanese do not like any kind of uncertainty in their business. They are highly risk aversive. They try to be certain about each term of the contract, before taking the final decision (Hofstede, 2019).

High long-term orientation: Every decision taken in the Japanese culture is based on long-term effectiveness. All business decisions are taken based on how fruit it might be in future. To work with Japanese people, Americans need to be more polite and formal. Japanese like decorum and take time in decision making. So, the American company needs to maintain its patience, when dealing with Japanese clients.

Based on Hofstede Cultural dimensions, given below is the cultural analysis of Germany: Power Distance is highly decentralized and supported by a strong middle class, Germany is not surprisingly among the lower power distant countries (score 35). Co-determination rights are comparatively extensive and have to be taken into account by the management. A direct and participative communication and meeting style is common, control is disliked and leadership is challenged to show expertise and best accepted when it’s based on it (Hofstede, 2019).

Answer 1

Introduction

The current globalisation and convergence of accounting standards paves the way for integration of economic development and growth of countries like US, UK, Japan, Afghanistan. However over years countries like Afghanistan have not rolled out administration procedures which can be globally accepted and haven't either adapted to different culture. Hence, it is imperative for countries to adapt and be flexible to new cultures, global standards and procedures and adopt best in class processes.