Question

in your own words what do you think about today's immigration policy and if you can change anything what would it be

Answer 1

Immigration has been a touchstone of the U.S. political discussion for a considerable length of time, as policymakers must weigh contending financial, security, and compassionate concerns. Congress has been unfit to achieve a concession to extensive immigration change for a considerable length of time, adequately moving some significant strategy choices into the official and legal parts of government and filling banter in the corridors of state and civil governments.

What moves have presidents made till now ?

Barack Obama. President Obama took a few activities to give brief lawful help to numerous undocumented foreigners. In 2012, his organization started a program, known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), that offered inexhaustible, two-year expulsion deferrals and work licenses to undocumented outsiders who had touched base to the United States as kids and had no criminal records. Obama portrayed the move as a "stopgap measure" and asked Congress to pass the Dream Act, enactment previously presented in 2001 that would have profited a considerable lot of similar individuals. As of March 2018, in excess of eight hundred thousand[PDF] had exploited DACA.

In 2014, Obama endeavored to stretch out comparable advantages to upwards of five million undocumented guardians of U.S. natives and changeless occupants. Be that as it may, in excess of two dozen U.S. states sued his organization, asserting that the program, known as Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA), damaged government immigration law and the U.S. Constitution. A Texas government judge hindered the program in 2015, and the Supreme Court viably slaughtered it in 2016.

The Obama organization's requirement rehearses drew analysis from the left and the right. Some worker backing bunches censured his organization for regulating the expulsion of in excess of three million individuals amid his eight-year residency, an assume that outpaced the organizations of previous Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bramble. Numerous Republicans said the Obama organization was delicate on implementation in narrowing its evacuation endeavors to undocumented workers who have carried out genuine violations.

Donald J. Trump. Trump has marked a few official requests influencing immigration approach. The primary, which concentrated on outskirt security, trained government offices to develop a physical divider "to get total operational control" of the U.S. outskirt with Mexico. Also, it required a conclusion to alleged catch and discharge rehearses, where certain unapproved workers who were caught at the fringe would be discharged into the United States while they anticipate court hearings. It additionally extended the utilization of "assisted expulsion" to incorporate any unapproved migrant who can't demonstrate they have been in the United States for a long time, enabling them to be evacuated without a court hearing.

The second official request, which concentrated on inside authorization, extended the classifications of unapproved settlers organized for expulsion and requested increments in implementation staff and evacuation offices. It likewise moved to confine government assets from purported haven wards, which now and again limit their collaboration with administrative immigration authorities.

The third request, which concentrated on fear based oppression avoidance, prohibited nationals from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen from entering the United States for something like ninety days; blocked nationals from Syria uncertainly; and suspended the U.S. displaced person program for 120 days.

These activities, especially the prohibition on explorers from seven Muslim-larger part nations, drew across the board dissents and lawful difficulties from people, urban areas, and states. The supposed travel boycott endured a few lawful difficulties; the Trump organization changed it twice, and it in the long run discovered its way to the Supreme Court, where judges permitted [PDF] a third emphasis to stand.

Trump more than split the yearly top of exiles admitted to the United States to fifty thousand, and his requests could make it increasingly hard for people to look for refuge; in excess of 180,000 connected for haven in 2016 [PDF]. In 2017, the Trump organization finished brief ensured status (TPS) for a huge number of Haitians and Nicaraguans who were permitted into the United States after ecological calamities in their nations of origin. Recipients of TPS are allowed to live and work in the United States for as long as eighteen months, a period that can be stretched out at the president's watchfulness. In 2018, Trump finished a similar alleviation program for a huge number of Hondurans, Nepalis, and Salvadorans.

In September 2017, Trump declared designs to eliminate DACA, which he called, alongside DAPA, "unlawful" activities by Obama, yet challenges in the courts have kept him from ending the program up to this point.

The Trump organization has likewise tightened up endeavors to deflect fringe intersections, including those looking for refuge. In mid 2018, it actualized an alleged zero-resistance approach at the southern outskirt, in which experts captured and criminally arraigned every single unapproved settler. Therefore, in excess of two thousand kid transients were kept independently from their folks or watchmen. President Trump finished the family partition approach in June following across the board dissents. Presidents Bush and Obama utilized comparable prevention measures however did not separate families.

If I got the chance to pick, what I would advance as an arrangement of activity is putting every one of our endeavors into rejoining families, and at the same time re-executing a program that doesn't keep individuals, and was appeared to be fruitful.

Answer 2

Today's immigration policy varies greatly depending on the country and region in question, as immigration policies are established and enforced by individual governments. Views on immigration policy can be diverse and influenced by various factors such as economic, social, and political considerations.

Some people support more open and inclusive immigration policies, arguing that they can bring economic benefits, cultural diversity, and contribute to the growth and development of a nation. They may emphasize the humanitarian aspect, advocating for the protection of refugees and providing opportunities for individuals seeking better lives.

On the other hand, there are those who advocate for stricter immigration policies, citing concerns about national security, economic strain, cultural assimilation, and the potential impact on job markets. They may argue for more controlled borders and stricter regulations to protect the interests and well-being of the existing population.

If given the opportunity to change immigration policies, people's suggestions can vary widely based on their personal beliefs and priorities. Some might advocate for comprehensive immigration reform, aiming to strike a balance between border security, economic considerations, and providing pathways for legal immigration. Others may call for policies that prioritize family reunification, streamline the immigration process, or address specific issues such as asylum seekers or undocumented immigrants.