Question

Consider the market for coffee beans. Suppose there are only two producers of coffee beans, Colombian...

Consider the market for coffee beans. Suppose there are only two producers of coffee beans, Colombian and Brazil. In years with very successful (large) crops, these two countries may voluntarily agree to restrict the amount of coffee they put on the market, in order to keep prices higher than they otherwise would be. Suppose a “successful” crop is 18 million bags for each country and the resulting price is $100 per bag of coffee. If they were going to withhold output, each county would only provide 16 million bags to the market at a price of $115 per bag. However, if just one country restricts output (16 million bags) but the other country does not restrict output (18 million bags) the price ends up being $105 per bag.

(a) Think of this as a two-by-two normal form game (two players, each player having two strategies (regular output, restricted output). In this normal form game there would be four different strategy combinations (e.g. Brazil regular output, Colombia regular output would be one combination). I know this is sort of strange, but write out the four different strategy combinations and the payoffs (revenue) for each player given each strategy combination. (Write this out, because you cannot submit the actual normal form game payoff matrix, but you should write out the payoff matrix on your scratch paper).

(b) What is the Nash equilibrium to this game? Briefly explain how you found the Nash equilibrium.

(c) This is admittedly a subjective question — what are your economic thoughts on this equilibrium and how it is (or is not) expected? (About two sentences.)

Be sure to answer parts (a) - (c).

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Answer:

(a) The payoff table:

Brazil
Columbia Regular Restricted
Regular 100, 100 105 105
Restricted 105, 105 115, 115

(b) Nash equilibrium lies in (Regular, Regular) move. That is, if both countries supply at lower price. They both cheat.

Reason: In a duoply, the seller with lower price will conquer the market. So whether Brazil chooses Regular or Restricted supply, Columbia will always choose Regular supply which will fetch him the whole market of coffee at a lower price. Similarly, Brazil will also choose Regular supply of the crop no matter what Columbia chooses, because it also wants to conquer the market for coffee. So even though the two countries have an agreement to supply a restricted quantity, they will cheat and supply the Regular supply at a lower price and both will settle for a payoff of 100 each.

With both countries always selecting Regular supply, (Regular, Regular) is the Nash equilibrium.

(c) It only makes sense that both supply regular quantity. By laws of Economics we know that in a duopoly, there are only two sellers. The seller with lower price will attract the market and earn higher profits. So, if either Brazil or Columbia chooses to stand by the agreement and supply restricted output, the other country will supply the Regular crop at loweer price and conquer the market.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Consider the market for coffee beans. Suppose there are only two producers of coffee beans, Colombian...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Consider the following extensive-form game with two players, 1 and 2. a). Find the pure-strategy Nash...

    Consider the following extensive-form game with two players, 1 and 2. a). Find the pure-strategy Nash equilibria of the game. [8 Marks] b). Find the pure-strategy subgame-perfect equilibria of the game. [6 Marks] c). Derive the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of the subgame. If players play this mixed Nash equilibrium in the subgame, would 1 player In or Out at the initial mode? [6 Marks] [Hint: Write down the normal-form of the subgame and derive the mixed Nash equilibrium of...

  • Suppose OPEC has only two producers, Saudi Arabia and Nigeria Saudi Arabia has far more oil...

    Suppose OPEC has only two producers, Saudi Arabia and Nigeria Saudi Arabia has far more oil reserves and is the lower cost producer compared to Nigeria. The payoff matrix in the table to the right shows the profits earned per day by each country. "Low output corresponds to producing the OPEC assigned quota and "high output corresponds to producing the maximum capacity beyond the assigned quota. What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? O A. There is no Nash...

  • Check my work In a two-player, one-shot simultaneous-move game each player can choose strategy A or...

    Check my work In a two-player, one-shot simultaneous-move game each player can choose strategy A or strategy B. If both players choose strategy A, each earns a choose strategy B, each earns a payoff of $200. If player 1 chooses strategy A and player 2 chooses strategy B, then player 1 earns $100 and player 2 earns $600. If player 1 chooses strategy Band player 2 chooses strategy A, then player 1 earns $600 and player 2 earns $100. payoff...

  • Consider the market for oil. Suppose for simplicity that there are only two oil producing countries—Saudi...

    Consider the market for oil. Suppose for simplicity that there are only two oil producing countries—Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Both countries must choose whether to produce a low output or a high output. Kuwait Low Output High Output These output strategies with corresponding profits are depicted in the payoff matrix to the right. Kuwait's profits are in red and Saudi Arabia's are in blue. $120 Suppose the two countries form a cartel. What is the cooperative equilibrium? $70 Low Output...

  • 3. (30 pts) Consider the following game. Players can choose either left () or 'right' (r) The tab...

    3. (30 pts) Consider the following game. Players can choose either left () or 'right' (r) The table provided below gives the payoffs to player A and B given any set of choices, where player A's payoff is the firat number and player B's payoff is the second number Player B Player A 4,4 1,6 r 6,1 -3.-3 (a) Solve for the pure strategy Nash equilibria. (4 pta) (b) Suppose player A chooses l with probability p and player B...

  • Games theory : Inside Oligopoly

    In a two-player, one-shot, simultaneous-move game, each player can choose strategy A or strategy B. If both players choose strategy A, each earns a payoff of $400. If both players choose strategy B, each earns a payoff of $200. If player 1 chooses strategy A and player 2 chooses strategy B, then player 1 earns $100 and player 2 earns $600. If player 1 chooses strategy B and player 2 chooses strategy A, then player 1 earns $600 and player...

  • Q.2 Consider the following normal-form game: Player 2 Player 1 3,2 1,1 -1,3 R. 0,0 Q.2.a...

    Q.2 Consider the following normal-form game: Player 2 Player 1 3,2 1,1 -1,3 R. 0,0 Q.2.a Identify the pure-strategy Nash equilibria. Q.2.b Identify the mixed-strategy Nash equilibria Q.2.c Calculate each player's expected equilibrium payoff.

  • Suppose that two players are playing the following game

    Suppose that two players are playing the following game. Player 1 can choose either top or bottom, and Player 2 can choose either left of right. The payoffs are given in the following table Player 2 Left Right top 9,4 2,3 Player 1 Bottom 1,0 3,1 where the number on the left is the payoff to Player 1 and the number on the right is the payoff to player 2. 1) Determine the nash equilibrium of the game. 2) If...

  • NEED WITHIN THE HOUR! Suppose that two players are playing the following game. Player A can...

    NEED WITHIN THE HOUR! Suppose that two players are playing the following game. Player A can choose either Top or Bottom, and Player B can choose either Left or Right. The payoffs are given in the following table where the number on the left is the payoff to Player A, and the number on the right is the payoff to Player B. Does Player A have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? Group of answer choices Top is...

  • Please help for the answer :) 62 6. Consider the market for sneakers with two firns,...

    Please help for the answer :) 62 6. Consider the market for sneakers with two firns, Like and Fuma. Both firms have to simultaneously decide between two strategies: Cooperate or Cheat If both firms choose Cooperate, they share the monopoly profit with each of them making $80m If one firm chooses to Cheat it makes a profit of $160m, while the other firm which chooses to Cooperate incurring a loss of $40m If both firms Cheat, they both make zero...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT