''Class struggle'' as Marx and Engels called it, was seen as a distinct feature that makes history progresses. Yet, not all history is about class struggle and the concept of class essentially subsumes nuances of social processes and phenomena into two opposing forces. While the explanation is grand in its narrative and ignores most of the elements that characterize history. History is not as simple as Marx and Engels put it, though their motive was to make people realized the class structure as to who controls and who is oppressed.
Do you agree with the claim by Marx and Engels that history essentially boils down to...
3. Do you agree with Ortega’s claim that we are (as of 1929, when he wrote The Revolt of the Masses) living in what he calls a hyperdemocracy? Explain.
Detractors claim that scanner-based research is like “driving a car down the road looking only in the rearview mirror.” What does this mean? Do you agree? Discuss in 200 words.
what do you know when you hear marx Communism- equal distribution- socialism- proltrian ?
There have been five major extinction events throughout the history of the earth. Some scientists claim that we are now living during the sixth extinction event caused primarily by human activity. Journalist Elizabeth Kolbert recently wrote a book called the “Six Extinction” that details some of the evidence. Refer to Readings and Resources for an article about her. Do you agree or disagree with this claim? In your discussion, give an example of one organism that is currently endangered or...
do you agree with government about death penalty? why do you agree or disagree ?
Unions Where are unionizing efforts focused today? Do you agree with unions? Why or why not? Please back your explanation with history and citations.
Unions Where are unionizing efforts focused today? Do you agree with unions? Why or why not? Please back your explanation with history and citations.
What makes one statement or claim science? Along these lines, how do you distinguish a scientific claim from a non-scientific claim, or pseudoscience? Construct a claim that you consider scientific and indicate how the claim meets the criteria for science – that it is falsifiable and repeatable. Challenge your peers to either agree or disagree with the scientific nature of your claim. After reading through Lab 1, pick a safety rule that was covered and write a few sentences explaining...
In c Do you agree, and why or why not?
How do you see yourself using the information you learned in Modern U.S. History class in your life going forward (be honest!)?