Question

Argue for or against the "Three Strikes"laws. Provide a rationale to support your response.

Argue for or against the "Three Strikes"laws. Provide a rationale to support your response.
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Three strike laws increases the sentences of a convict who already had been convicted for violent crimes or serious crime twice in the past. This mostly convert the sentence at least into life sentence when 3rd time serious crime has been committed.
I argue in the favour this law. A person who commits a crime , actually a serious crime , is punished with intention of reforming the individual. It is also aimed at making the convict realise the fact that act committed is undesirable and should not be repeated. However, if that person does not get reformed and commit crime again and again, there should not be arguments to have lenient treatment for such individual. They had not learned from past mistakes and defeat the purpose of reformative justice

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Argue for or against the "Three Strikes"laws. Provide a rationale to support your response.
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT