The premise is:-"Iraq posed a threat to us"
The conclusion is:- "we had to invade it"
The argument is deductive since it is definite that they have invaded Iraq
Identify the premise (s) and conclusion and translation in this argument, explain why it is deductive or inductive:...
Identify the whether the argument is best viewed as deductive or inductive, identify the premise and conclusion and explain your decision in this case... Explain the the universal principle that says something holds without exception which turns into a deductive or inductive argument : The indentation on the West coast of Africa is about the same size as the east coast of South America, indicating that the two continents were once connected.
Construct three arguments: 1. A valid deductive argument with a false premise. 2. A valid deductive argument with a false conclusion. 3. A strong inductive argument with a false premise.
Determine whether the given argument uses inductive or deductive reasoning. If deductive, determine whether the reasoning is valid or invalid. If it is sunny, we are not watching tv. We are watching tv. So, it must not be sunny.
explain the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning and why deductive reasoning is more appropriate for the positivist write not less than 500 words
1. Explain the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning in terms of why deductive reasoning is more appropriate for positivist research 2. Explain why analysing scientific research data is not just about descriptions but about explanations. 3. Discuss the experimental method in terms of its role in a positivist research exercise. 4. Discuss the purpose of the theoretical framework in terms of its function as a lens. 1. Explain the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning in terms of why...
For each of the following passages, label the premise, and the conclusion with c. Indicate whether the argument is inductive or deductive. Susie must be smart since she reads a lot, and people who read a lot are usually smart. John is a philosopher and all philosophers are crazy. It just follows that John is crazy. So far, every time I’ve turned the knob on my stove the burner has ignited. The burner will ignite the next time I turn...
B. For each of the following passages, identify and state the conclusion (if there is one). If the passage contains an inductive argument, state both its conclusion and what kind of inductive argument it is. Briefly justify your answer. If the passage does not contain an argument or if the argument is not inductive, briefly explain why. In 1982, an American Roman Catholic organisation called Applied Research in the Apostolate sponsored a poll of people across the world to determine...
Hi need help in identify and stating the conclusion(if there is one). If the passage contains an inductive argument, state both its conclusion and what kind of inductive argument it is. Briefly justify your answer. If the passage does not contain an argument or if the argument is not inductive, briefly explain why. In 1982, an American Roman Catholic organisation called Applied Research in the Apostolate sponsored a poll of people across the world to determine their values, attitudes, and...
For each of the following passages, identify and state the conclusion (if there is one). If the passage contains an inductive argument, state both its conclusion and what kind of inductive argument it is. Briefly justify your answer. If the passage does not contain an argument or if the argument is not inductive, briefly explain why. Adults who are sleeping and who are found, by physiological tests, to be undergoing what is called REM (rapid eye movement) sleep regularly report...
For each of these scenario please identify the following: Identify the type of inductive argument and any features of the way the argument is constructed that you find relevant. Explain how convincing you think the argument is. Does it have sufficient evidence to allow you to suggest that she move forward with the idea or does the argument have knowledge gaps? What questions need to be answered to close these gaps? Does the argument contain any information that adds to...