In multivariable analysis, the terms confounding and effect modification come into play. Why do you think they are important? What effect do they have in statistical analysis?
The terms Confounding and Effect modification come into play, in multivariate analysis.
They are important because :-
a.) Confounding :- If other factors that influence the outcome are unevenly distributed between the groups, these other factors can distort the apparent association between the outcome and the primary exposure of interest; this is what is meant by confounding. When there is confounding, multi-variable methods can be used to estimate the association between an exposure and an outcome after adjusting for, or taking into account, the impact of one or more confounding factors (other risk factors). In essence, multiple variable analysis allows us to assess the independent effect of each of the exposures.
b.) Effect Modification :- They occurs when the magnitude of the effect of the primary exposure on an outcome (i.e., the association) differs depending on the level of a third variable. For example, suppose a clinical trial is conducted and the drug is shown to result in a statistically significant reduction in total cholesterol. However, suppose that with closer scrutiny of the data, the investigators find that the drug is only effective in subjects with a specific genetic marker and that there is no effect in persons who do not possess the marker. This is an example of effect modification or "interaction". The effect of the treatment is different depending on the presence or absence of the genetic marker. Multi-variable methods can also be used to assess effect modification. This phenomenon of "effect modification" is distinct from confounding. When effect modification is present, it would be misleading to compute an overall estimate of the association because the association is different for those with or without the third factor. A common way of dealing with effect modification is examine the association separately for each level of the third variable. Nevertheless, multiple variable procedures can be used to identify effect modification.
The effects they have in statistical analysis are:-
a.) Confounding :-
Confounding is a distortion (inaccuracy) in the estimated measure of association that occurs when the primary exposure of interest is mixed up with some other factor that is associated with the outcome.
There are three conditions that must be present for confounding to occur:
Since most health outcomes have multiple contributing causes, there are many possible confounders. For example, a study looking at the association between obesity and heart disease might be confounded by age, diet, smoking status, and a variety of other risk factors that might be unevenly distributed between the groups being compared.
b.) Effect Modification :-
Effect modification occurs when the magnitude of the effect of the primary exposure on an outcome (i.e., the association) differs depending on the level of a third variable. In this situation, computing an overall estimate of association is misleading. One common way of dealing with effect modification is examine the association separately for each level of the third variable. For example, suppose a clinical trial is conducted and the drug is shown to result in a statistically significant reduction in total cholesterol. However, suppose that with closer scrutiny of the data, the investigators find that the drug is only effective in subjects with a specific genetic marker and that there is no effect in persons who do not possess the marker. The effect of the treatment is different depending on the presence or absence of the genetic marker. This is an example of effect modification or "interaction".
Unlike confounding, effect modification is a biological phenomenon in which the exposure has a different impact in different circumstances. Another good example is the effect of smoking on risk of lung cancer. Smoking and exposure to asbestos are both risk factors for lung cancer. Non-smokers exposed to asbestos have a 3-4 fold increased risk of lung cancer, and most studies suggest that smoking increases the risk of lung cancer about 20 times. However, shipyard workers who chronically inhaled asbestos fibers and also smoked had about a 64-fold increased risk of lung cancer. In other words, the effects of smoking and asbestos were not just additive – they were multiplicative. This suggests synergism or interaction, i.e., that the effect of smoking is somehow magnified in people who have also been exposed to asbestos. Multivariable methods can also be used to assess effect modification.
In multivariable analysis, the terms confounding and effect modification come into play. Why do you think they are impor...
What do you understand about chemical modification of RNA? What role they play in terms of functions?
Consider the terms knowledge, truth, and belief. What do these terms mean to you? Why do you think these concepts will be important in this class?
What role do formally constructed speeches play in communication campaigns? Why do you think public speaking is still an important part of communication campaigns?
Have you seen project budgets? Do you manage them? Do you perform any analysis? Why do you think project budgets are important to maintain on a job?
5. In terms of economic growth, what do you think is the most important factor or economic institution? Why?
DO YOU THINK THAT BILINGUAL HAS AN EFFECT ON LEXICAL DECISION TASKS? WHY OR WHY NOT
scussion . How does exercise come to play regarding Nutrition? . Why is it important? . How is energy balance affected by exercise? How does exercises contribute to one's health and wellness? What are some of the different exercises you do on a daily or weekly basis? I want the the time, not every now and then Darticinante must create a thread in order to view other student threads in this forum
Do you think healthcare is in constant change? Why or why not? Critical analysis, please.
Why do you think it is important to have a first aid kit? Do you have a kit and if so where do you keep it? If not, do you plan on putting one together and what would be in it?
In the geriatric population, what role do caregivers play in this future? Do you think they should have more medical authority or less?