In the books of Rose kim | |||||
Date | Particulars | Debit | Credit | ||
(b) | 01-Jan-18 | Tee Wang A/c Dr. | 71200 | ||
To, Sales | 71200 | ||||
01-Jan-18 | Note receivable A/c Dr. | 71200 | |||
To, Tee Wang | 71200 | ||||
('c) | Date | Opening balance | Interest | Closing balance | |
31-Dec-18 | 71,200 | 4,272 | 75,472 | ||
31-Dec-19 | 75,472 | 4,528 | 80,000 | ||
In the books of Rose kim | |||||
(d) | Date | Particulars | Debit | Credit | |
01-Jan-18 | Tee Wang A/c Dr. | 71200 | |||
To, Sales | 71200 | ||||
01-Jan-18 | Note receivable A/c Dr. | 71200 | |||
To, Tee Wang | 71200 | ||||
31-Dec-18 | Note receivable A/c Dr. | 4,272 | |||
To, Interest on Note receivable | 4,272 | ||||
31-Dec-18 | Interest on Note receivable A/c Dr. | 4,272 | |||
To, Profit and loss A/c | 4,272 | ||||
31-Dec-19 | Note receivable A/c Dr. | 4,528 | |||
To, Interest on Note receivable | 4,528 | ||||
31-Dec-19 | Interest on Note receivable A/c Dr. | 4,528 | |||
To, Profit and loss A/c | 4,528 | ||||
31-Dec-19 | Bank A/c Dr. | 80,000 | |||
To, Note receivable | 80,000 | ||||
Present value of Consideration as on 01 january 2018 | |||||
= | 80,000/(1.06)^2 | ||||
= | 71199.7152 | ||||
Short Answer Question 4 - Non-Interesting bearing note On January 1, 2018, Rose Kim Co performed...
On December 31, 2015, Tamarisk Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Tamarisk Co. agreed to accept a $262,700 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Tamarisk is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Assuming Tamarisk Co.’s fiscal year-end is December 31, prepare the journal entry for December 31,...
On December 31, 2015, Tamarisk Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Tamarisk Co. agreed to accept a $262,700 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Tamarisk is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Assuming Tamarisk Co.’s fiscal year-end is December 31, prepare the journal entry for December 31,...
On December 31, 2015, Riverbed Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Riverbed Co. agreed to accept a $298,600 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 10%. Riverbed is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. A) Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2015, for the...
On December 31, 2015, Culver Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Culver Co. agreed to accept a $318,100 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Culver is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 5%. Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2015, for the Culver...
On December 31, 2015, Swifty Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Swifty Co. agreed to accept a $293,800 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Swifty is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2015, for the Swifty...
On December 31, 2020, Blue Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Blue Co. agreed to accept a $322,700 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2022, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 10%. Blue is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2020, for the Blue...
On December 31, 2020, Blue Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Blue Co. agreed to accept a $322,700 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2022, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 10%. Blue is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2020, for the Blue...
?On December 31, 2015, Bonita Co. performed environmental
consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and
Bonita Co. agreed to accept a $346,500 zero-interest-bearing note
due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a
credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Bonita is
much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%.
On December 31, 2019 Frost company performed engineering consulting services for Palmquist, Inc. Palmquist was short of cash, and Frost Co. agreed to accept a $230,000, zero-interest-bearing not due December 21,2021, as payment in full. Palmquist is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 8%. Frost is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 5%. Instructions: Prepare the following journal entries for Frost Co. YOU MUST SHOW SUPPORTING COMPUTATIONS TO RECEIVE...
Problem # 3 (Notes Receivable with Unrealistic Interest Rate) On December 31, 2015, Tran Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayden Co. Hayden was short of cash, and Tran Co. agreed to accept a $100,000 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayden is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 15%. Tran is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 8%. Instructions 1. Prepare the journal entry...