Ans) The role of cognition in diagnostic reasoning has been an area of interest in Emergency Medicine for over 15 years and is gaining attention in anesthesiology and critical care; however, examination of the use and validity of different decision pathways is in its infancy. Studies should be conducted to understand the cognitive processes used by skilled and seasoned physicians in critical care and to understand how stressors and other variables impact their performance.
- The latter will help overcome some of the questions raised from studies on students and early residents.
Rather than regarding different strategies as either friend or foe, it may be more worthwhile starting with an open-ended approach to understand what differentiates high and low levels of performance. Exposure of a cohort of trainees to a standard of septic shock and development of a validated scoring tool revealed a wide range of technical and behavioral performances.79 Similar studies can be conducted with emphasis on evaluating what aspects of decision making underlie variations in performance. Creation of educational programs around the strategies associated with the best diagnostic performance will provide trainees with models of expertise and its nature at an earlier part of their training.
- The concentration of errors in critical care certainly mirrors the high burden of illness and number of interventions experienced by this population but also generates some questions of whether physician factors synergize with the patients’ states in a manner that amplifies risk and whether there are means by which this can be minimized
- The face validity of the psychological concepts of judgment under uncertainty to critical care seems high; however, naturalistic studies to back up these assumptions are essential to any effort designed to improve patient safety in the ICU
justifying your choice by comparing and contrasting the weaknesses and strengths of competing methods for medical...
concerning quantitative justifying your choice by comparing and contrasting the weaknesses and strengths of competing methods for medical errors
compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of mixed methods reseaech for medical errors.
Discuss 2 Quality Improvement Tools by comparing and contrasting their strengths and potential barriers.
Comparing the strengths and weaknesses of a company's current target market and marketing mix with what its competitors are doing (or are likely to do) can be accomplished by: A. clustering B. scenario analysis C. brand positioning D. marketing mix review E. competitor analysis
7 to 10 sentence paragraph on: Ones strengths and weaknesses that will impact your role as a Medical Assistant in an administrative role
Identify four capital investment evaluation methods and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each method.
As you review Mr. Jones’ social and medical history, you note several strengths and weaknesses that play a role in how Mr. Jones is able to connect with you as a provider, how he understands the surgical risks, and his ability to cope both mentally and physically post-surgery. What are those strengths and weaknesses?
Solve the problem by all three methods. Then, write a paragraph comparing and contrasting each method. Prepare 0.1 g of an IM medication from a strength of 200 mg per mL.
post your explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of the dyadic relationship in LMX Theory. Explain the impact these strengths and weaknesses might have on leadership. Compare LMX Theory to Transformational Leadership. Explain the relationship between the characteristics of LMX Theory and Transformational Leadership. Provide an example from your experience or one from the Learning Resources that supports your response
When it comes to time management, describe your strengths and weaknesses in this area