Accepting subjective relativism (everyone's "opinion" is equally right) entails that individuals are morally infallible since there is no external moral standard.
True
False
Subjective relativism refers that an action is morally right if one approves it, which tells that a person's approval makes the action correct or right.
The above one is completely opposite of cultural objectivism, wherein in order an action to be considered as right, it must follow certain moral principles.
Thus, subjective relativism has some troubling implications, as it is approved by a person alone, not by set moral principles.
Since individuals can never have a genuine moral disagreement, subjective relativism implies that each person is morally infallible.
So, the given statement is 'True'.
Accepting subjective relativism (everyone's "opinion" is equally right) entails that individuals are morally infallible since there...
SUBJECTIVISM, RELATIVISM, AND EMOTIVISM MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. b Subjective relativism is the doctrine that a an action is morally right if one approves of it. an action is morally right if one's culture approves of it C actions are judged by objective standards. an action is morally right even if no one approves of it. d 2. Suppose I think that I sometimes make mistakes on moral matters, and so does my culture. Acknowledging this, I say, "My moral beliefs...
Whether an action is morally right or wrong is the same issue as whether it is? Group of answer choices legally acceptable none of the others socially acceptable personally desirable Flag this Question Question 23 pts According to Darwin, creatures with the following properties are likely to develop a moral sense? Select all that apply. Group of answer choices have lengthy gestation periods possess language are mammals can develop habits are intelligent have social instincts/sympathies are bipedal Flag this Question...
Please see the articles below… 1. What is your opinion on the subject? 2. Which ethical views (i.e., utilitarian view, moral rights view, justice view, practical view) you feel are being used by both sides of the argument (i.e., for and against downloading) to justify their positions? High Court Enters File-Sharing Spat; Justices Must Determine Software Providers' Liability For Copyright Violations by Anne Marie Squeo. Wall Street Journal. (Eastern edition). New York, N.Y.: Mar 30, 2005. pg. A.2 WASHINGTON -- The Supreme...