What are the arguments for and against the imposition of mandatory retirement? Is this likely to be optimal from the point of view of the worker or the employer? What alternatives would you suggest?
If retirement age is made mandatory it will appear be to age discrimination.The idea of mandatory retirement is that workers dont stay with their employers for long especially at high wages.To avoid law suits of age discrimination against mandatory retirement, employers can make contractual agreement for a person in the age group of 30yrs to retire after 38 yrs.This contractual agreement of mandatory retirement will make openings for new employees and new ideas.If retirement age is specified, employers might even like to employ older employees taking into consideration the experience of such employees.However ,setting a mandatory retirement age will call for strong opposition as it will effect the senior citizens.It is believed that older persons do not allow businesses to choose the best person for the job.If retirement age is not made mandatory,the work force will improve and the employers will have the benefit of experience and skills of the work force. The burden on the pension system of ageing population will be less.It will improve the labour market supply.This will lead to older people participating in society.
Imposition of mandatory retirement is not optimal from the point of view of the employer and employee as well because there will be increase in welfare expenditure and burden on the pension system of the employer. The employees will be discriminated on age basis and lose their dignity and self reliance.
Mandatory retirement is inefficient and since our population is ageing ,no country can afford to lose skilled workers at a premature level. There will be lower outcome and so rate of participation of older workers should increase. So mandatory retirement should be abolished.As such inherent worth and dignity of workers of all ages will be recognised and this step will reduce welfare expenditure as well.
What are the arguments for and against the imposition of mandatory retirement? Is this likely to...
Discuss arguments for and against government intervention to protect the living standard of middle income and poor people in retirement through aggressive progressive taxation, redistribution and subsidies. If you favor the against position suggest alternatives to address the problem or justify doing nothing from an economic and ethical point of view.
2) What were the features of abolishing of mandatory
retirement at age 65 (ontario , canada)?
3) What was the impact of abolishing mandatory retirement
age?
Task Word / Hand written Q1) Complete the table Types of plan What is the employees benefit Conditions of the employeer GAIN SHRAING GOAL SHARING PROFIT SHARING ESOP'S Q2) in your own words define the issues in gainsharing and goal sharing plans? 03) Do you think non-monetary plans are important why?
What are 2 arguments for legalizing marijuana? What are 2 arguments against legalization? In your opinion which side has a stronger argument? Why? 1/2 page And Given all of the health hazards from tobacco, drug, and excessive alcohol use, who do you believe should be responsible for the medical expenses of users? Insurance Companies or the users themselves? Please explain. 1/2 page
What are the arguments for and against the doctrine of precedent in a legal system? What position do you side with and why?
help
art ll-Arguments Against the HPV Mandatory Vaccination Policy nce the executive order became public, the Texas legislators were besieged by phone calls, letters, emails, and personal confrontations from the public that he ord occasionally vaccinations were known to kill some people. Additional arguments included the following were widely reported i er on the basis of personal freedom, religious objection, and quoting "the well-known fact" that * HPv is a sexually transmitted disease; it is can only be spread by...
What are the arguments against lying, cheating, breaking promises, and stealing, and to what extent do you agree or disagree with them? Be specific. Present any other arguments you can think of and justify them as fully as you can.
How confident would you be using PrEP as your only protection against HIV? What would contribute to your confidence or reluctance? In what ways are arguments for and against PrEP similar to those used when discussing hormonal contraception? Lucas repeats accusations of misconduct against the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, for whom Myers works, in an attempt to discredit the organization. Do these statements make you less likely to trust Myers’ arguments? Why or why not?
What arguments could you give for or against the idea that body language is a science with principles that can be interpreted accurately by specialists?
What arguments could you give for or against the idea that body language is a science with principles that specialists can interpret accurately?
Do you believe that healthcare workers are more likely to commit unintentional or intentional torts against patients? What are the most common forms of torts you would expect to see occurring in healthcare? Should there be more severe consequences for committing an intentional versus an unintentional tort against a patient? Should a healthcare worker's license or credential be at risk when a healthcare worker is found responsible for committing either an unintentional or intentional tort against a patient? If you...