Question

Scenario: What if a client asks you to save money by cutting out some of the security measures that you recommended, yet your analysis of the client's security needs shows that sensitive information will be at risk if you do so? You try to explain this to the client, but he/she is adamant. Alternative 1: Should you go ahead and configure the network ina less secure manner? Alternative 2: Should you "eat" the cost and install the extra security measures at no cost to the client? Alternative 3: Should you refuse to do the job? Would it make a difference if the client's business were in a regulated industry, and implementing the lower security standards would constitute a violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act?

Answer 1

tealts Iasurance portabilihy and acco untability act [99 three typey As per HIPAA Sccurity Reguires implemcotahion of Safe guards ademinishahive ( physrcal (i) technical. IP ncccnary penalte of aay Company violate He legal action to has pory HIPAA act Fhe compan and be takeo Cao La violabing HIPAA act A ltrnative :- 4f e choo se this are betrr choicc its 7ot So a Alteroatire Hne Cost and iratalling eha Sce ariky and is better g00d deci sion 2 laco of Complying to Hne HIPAA bear cast hich is hare to but Company unproftable. Snstead asking the dieot and explaining he m0 Compliance of HIPAA and shooing Hhe dicot issuc betore HIPAA ich cffects of that ny one ca ultomately hits clieat's best choice this Luiocs, a Making cleot to admit is Allergative Yes qui ting Hthe job alone and 31 this raising and Aling legal achon againts ne dreot be ter choice. Concern Altemative 3 The better choic if could be act according to of HIPA4