Question

AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) afflicts 38 million people worldwide. Almost 3 million people died from AIDs in 2003 alone, and over 20 million have died since the epidemic began. A vaccine that could prevent or slow down the spread of this deadly disease would be a boon to the world. However, since 1981 when the first cases of AIDS were diagnosed, researchers have been unsuccessful in their attempts to develop such a vaccine. The efforts of a company called VaxGen illustrate the complexity of this task. VaxGen, which is located in Brisbane, California, developed a vaccine called AIDSVAX. The vaccine contained synthetic proteins of recombinant gp120, a protein normally found on the surface of HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. The vaccine was designed to induce the immune system to respond to this noninfectious protein and to produce antibodies that could protect the recipient from an actual HIV infection. In phase I clinical trials, the vaccine was tested for safety. Phase II clinical trials included a larger-scale test for safety as well as a test for the production of antibodies against gp120. As a result of these trials, AIDSVAX was shown to be safe, and patients receiving the vaccine did develop antibodies against gp120. Phase III clinical trials involved large-scale, placebo-controlled, double-blind tests of the vaccine’s effectiveness. The first trial began in June of 1998 and involved 5,100 homosexual men and 300 women, all volunteers, from the United States, Puerto Rico, Canada, and the Netherlands. The second trial began in March of 1999 and involved 2,500 IV drug abusers from Bangkok, Thailand. Both trials were completed in 2003. Unfortunately, these trials revealed no difference in the overall rate of HIV infection between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated participants. The data indicate that recipients of the vaccine did produce antibodies against gp120, but that those antibodies were not adequate to protect against HIV infection. (It did appear that certain subgroups—ethnic minorities other than Hispanic—exhibited a small but statistically significant lowering of the infection rate, but these results are still being examined.) Questions 1. Why do you think a person would volunteer to test an AIDS vaccine? 2. In the AIDSVAX trials, some people were given a placebo instead of the vaccine. All the recipients had been told of this possibility ahead of time, but they did not know which substance they were receiving. Is it ethical to give some of the trial participants only a placebo? 3. If a vaccine being tested works for some ethnic minorities but not others, do you think it should be given to just those races or to everyone? 4. Since the antibodies produced in AIDSVAX recipients were insufficient to protect them against infection, what might scientists try next? 5. If a private company develops an AIDS vaccine, it will spend a large amount of money on development and testing. Should it offer the vaccine free of charge to people who cannot afford it, especially those in very poor countries? How can private companies afford to develop vaccines if they do not charge for them?

Answer 1

1.The reasons a person can volunteer to test to an AIDS vaccine are

• High risk group (infected partner parents positive )
• LGBT community
• Low socioeconomic group ,unemployed individuals  who face financial crisis and if offered some thing like this makes them to volunteer themselves and get monetary gains
• People who are homeless ,no relations and if concerned to be useful to others in some way can offer themselves

2.According to American Association Code of Ethics this is not encouraged or ethical .If a placebo is given it is a must to be informed to then participant and get approved before administration

3.This can be done if certain group of people are benefited than others as it is a way of prevention of some infection at least to certain groups

4.The scientist has to try a most potent way to inhibit this by altering the titre of the medication administered to produce more antibodies agains the strains

5.Vaccination should be offered free of cost irrespective of any social background. Private companies can afford it by enrolling with the government and get necessary commission or share from the vaccinations