Question

Discuss if the FLMA go to far so that it hurts employers? Discuss and defend your answers. Votes Click ide to cast your vote or + to add a supporting reason. Add suppo Supp orts Challe nges Cast vote Votes rt For Against + 1 0 1

Answer 1

Introduction

The FMLA stands for Family and Medical Leave Act which was passed in the year 1993 in August in the United States. Its working is such that it aims at providing medical and family leaves and maternity benefits to all employees that work in companies with more than 50 employees.

Over the years, the state of economy has changed in its entire thought process in which people no longer consider the labour force to be a liability or an expense but have enabled easier road maps for them to work properly and have higher loyalty towards business.

Before the passage of the FMLA employees were in continuous stress about having to lose their jobs or had to take a break from work and were unemployed during maternity needs. The FMLA is one such law which helped the industry create standards for having employees that were free from stress and their contribution towards work largely saw an increase.

Against

My immediate support is against the notion that the FMLA has caused any damage to the employers as such. The employer employee relationship has been strengthened by the Law which promotes a work life balance and allows for paid leaves or leaves due to medical reasons.

Treating employees like equals is extremely important it promotes harmony and is seen as a tool that helps employees gain trust and respect. Once that happens, an employee builds a relationship with the company over a period of time and employees leaving jobs and turnovers are relatively much lower.

Furthering to the discussion, the employees that get proper leaves and maternity and other benefits as prescribed by the law tend to have favourable working environments and their overall productivity tends to be relatively much higher.

This in my opinion therefore has only helped the employers get enough workforce to be motivated at work and has helped in bridging the gap in which they felt the need for switching jobs or were insecure at work.

The only consideration against the law is that for smaller companies which have just entered business there are added costs of granting such leaves which they may not be able to pay. So, some may consider reducing their size which prevents them from growing beyond 50 employees which is seen as the minimum requirement for this law. However, in a country like America which is well developed and doing great this should not be seen as a restricting factor.

Conclusion: -

Laws that are in favour of employees should not be seen as going too far for employers. Building mutual respect and trust of one another is important for productivity and lower employee turnovers. This will help employees in getting added revenue to the organization and the profits will only rise if employees are stress free and can raise their issues at an appropriate forum.

Please feel free to ask your doubts in the comments section if any.