There are special protections for the common law doctrine employment at will for patient abuse and whistleblowing. What are they and why should they exist?
Ans) Several federal and state statutes prevent the at-will doctrine from being applied e.g., employment discrimination laws and whistleblower protection laws.
- Retaliation is another statute-based exception to the at-will presumption. Federal and/or state laws prohibit employers from firing employees in retaliation for engaging in legally proper, necessary, or desirable activities.
- Example of protected activities include claiming minimum wage or overtime compensation, engaging in union activities, opposing unlawful discriminatory practices, filing for workers' compensation, and "whistleblowing."
- While most states provide whistleblower protection for public sector employees, protection for private sector employees is more limited. Approximately seventeen states have enacted whistleblower statutes that protect private sector employees from adverse employment actions if they report an employer’s wrongdoing.
- Where there is no general state statute, private employees are left with a patchwork of federal and state statutes that address a wide variety of issues including workplace health and safety, environmental protection, accounting fraud, and discrimination, that also include whistleblower protections. The challenge for employees in these jurisdictions is to find a statute that applies to their particular circumstances.
There are special protections for the common law doctrine employment at will for patient abuse and...
what are the special protections granted to substance abuse patient records.
What are some special protections granted to substance abuse patient records?
What is the common law doctrine of employment at will? Identify an exception to the doctrine, and how the exception would apply? Employment relationships have traditionally been governed by the common law doctrine of employment at will. Either party may terminate the employment relationship at anytime and for any reason, unless doing so violates an employee's statutory or constitutional rights. Some courts have held that an implied employment contract exists between the employer and the employee. If the employee is...
what sort of inservice education would you give to health-care staff describing the special protections granted to substance abuse patient records.
The common law doctrine giving the employer the clear upper hand in employment relationships was gradually undercut by all of the following laws except: 26. a. Child labor laws b. FLSA C. NLRA d. OECD e. Implied contract law Employees today can sue for wrongful discharge under guidelines established by state courts. Employees may be entitled in most jurisdictions to: 27. a. Get their job back b. Gain a seist and desist order c. Back pay and punitive and compensatory...
1. a, Explain employment-at-will and give one (1) example of an exception to at-will doctrine? b, What is the employee handbook and why is it important?
What is the doctrine of special creation? Why would a natural explanation of the origin of species be so radical that Darwin would suppress it for 20 years?
1. Why is the employment-at-will doctrine considered asymmetric? 2. Show why racial and sexual discrimination are immoral by means of Kantian-type analysis, by using a Rawlsian approach, and by using a utilitarian approach. ? 3. What is child labor, and why is it objectionable? What are some reasons given in support of various sorts of child labor? Be sure to bring in ideas and theories on the topics from your personal experience or previous studies. As always, please cite your...
Discuss the most common federal regulatory issues, such as fraud and abuse, Stark Law, HIPAA, EMTALA, and IRS requirements for tax-exempt organizations, as well as less common concerns that arise under the antitrust laws and federal and state laws regulating third-party payers.
Employment Law Question Can an employer specify "recent college graduates only" in an employment ad? Why or why not? What rule/law/regulation supports this?