Question

The war on drugs often targets the drug trade internationally but many effective treatments for drug use happen in local communities. What do you think would be the consequences of shifting the “War on Drugs” policy from international wars to community-based programs? How do you think these changes would occur? What about shifting the “War on Drugs” from a supply focus to a demand focus and from an enforcement focus to a prevention focus?

Answer 1

In America, drug abuse among enemies is a must to wage both the supply and demand fronts. Modern drug war policy made Mexican marijuana was the government's first lesson in the iron law of drug economic operations intercepts resulted in the reorganization of the international drug trade. Drugs entered the US through land, sea, and air. Federal and state governments moved away from marijuana decriminalization. The average use of funding for eradication interdiction programs improved the annual average from $437 million to 1.4billion dollars during the first time.
Republicans supply sided drug policy Clinton spends more money on both the demand and supply fronts of the government drug policy. Clinton attracted media attention when he spends on rehabilitation and prevention programs. There was a substatial increase in the eradication program and law enforcement. so Clinton increases the percentage for spent on-demand on the drug war. Clinton innovated commonly action program and grass-root organization for the drug war.