Question

Summarize both articles in your own words and also propose a method by which you would like to see textbooks reviewed at the state level.

Article 1: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/education/24evolution.html?pagewanted=1&_r=0

article 2: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/29/education/creationists-on-texas-panel-for-biology-textbooks.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&

Answer 1

Ques-1: Article 1: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/education/24evolution.html?pagewanted=1&_r=0

The given article has critically describing about "science whether it is faith or scientific -related". The basic principles were examined. This has explained by a few scietists & finally concluded that the basics of evolution is not fairly because of faith it is purely because of natural selection. The human evolution is completely is not due to Creator but it is purely due to evolutionary aspects that explains how human beings have evolved from earlier life froms. Many of young people have illustrated that the man is due to the God's creation. However, science and experimental aspects have revealed that the "genomic and proteomics data" human is resulted from single celled species to multicellular species that contradicting the statement "God has not created humans in his own image" finally depicts anti-religion phenomenon.

Natural selection is completely different to explain the kind of adaptations acquired by the species during evolution. Theological aspects are independent of structural adaptations developed by the individual species as these adaptations are completely relies upon genetic variations Evolution in terms of natural selection and natural theology is not a common topic of conversation because it is an offensive subject a better conversation due to insufficient evidence about the origin of species and creation. Origin of species either by a creator or by nature is still in a great religious debate as various scientific hypotheses are describing that evolution started from aquatic region to land stage according to natural selections and genetic variations but various philosophical, religious and mythological beliefs are describing that evolution is from a unknown creator and nature. There is no availability of adequate evidence to resolve this great debate so people might just not or talk about creation or evolution at all.