Problem 4. (10 Pts) Two design alternatives (X and Y) are being considered for a new...
Solve only a) using excel Two design alternatives (X and Y) are being considered for a new ride at the Disney Theme park. Alternative X requires a $400,000 investment and will produce net annual revenue of $43708 every year. Alternative Y requires a $ 480,000 investment and produces 1st year revenue of $ 43708; thereafter revenue decreases by $3,000 every year. a)Based on a 6% MARR, which design alternative (X or Y) has the smallest Discounted Payback Period?
Practice Problem 2 • Two alternative designs are under consideration for a new ride called the Scream Machine at a theme park located in Florida. The two candidate designs differ in complexity, cost and predicted revenue. Alternative A will require an investment of $300,000 and is estimated to produce revenue of $55,000 annually over a 10-year horizon. Alternative B will require an investment of $450,000 and is expected to generate annual revenue of $80,000. A negligible salvage value is assumed...
Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered for purchase. Doing nothing is also an option. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 10% per year. Using the PW method, which alternative, if either, should be recommended? Capital Investment Annual Revenues Annual Expenses MV at end of useful life Useful Life IRR Alternative 1 $15,000 $8,000 $2,900 $2,000 4 years 17.2% Alternative 2 $23,000 $12,000 S3,000 $800 12 years 38.4%
Problem (2): Consider the following three mutually exclusive alternatives. MARR is 10%. Alternative 1 10,000 Alternative 2 14,500 Alternative 3 20,000 $3,000 increasing by 500 each year thereafter negligible $5,000 Initial investment Annual yielded returns Salvage Value Service life $5,000 $5,000 negligible 6 a) Compute the payback (PB) period and discounted PB period of each alternative. Based on the PB period, which alternative do you recommend? b) Using Annual-worth analysis, which alternative do you recommend?
USE ANNUAL WORTH Analysis Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given in the following table with MARR = 10% per year. Suggest your recommendation by using multiple attribute annual worth AW analysis. Design A Design B Investment cost (RM) 28,000 55,000 One-off expenses 10,000 13,000 In year 4 (RM) Annual revenues (RM) 22,000 28,000 Market value (RM) 6,000 8,000 Useful life 10 years 6 years
2) Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered, with each one having a useful life of 10 years. The estimated sales and cost data for each alternative are shown. Annual revenues are based on the number of units sold and the selling price. Annual expenses are based on the fixed and variable costs. If the MARR is 20% per year, determine which alternative is preferable based on the PW Method. 12 Investment cost Units to be sold each year...
2) Two mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered, with each one having a useful life of 10 years. The estimated sales and cost data for each alternative are shown. Annual revenues are based on the number of units sold and the selling price. Annual expenses are based on the fixed and variable costs. If the MARR is 20% per year, determine which alternative is preferable based on the PW Method. 12 Investment cost Units to be sold each year...