Question

You have been asked to give a presentation to a law school class on digital crime. After the presentation, a student asks why so few people are actually prosecuted for computer crime when these crimes seem to be happening all the time. Give a five-point outline of your response to this question. Assess the impact on preventing crimes from your perspective given these issues.

Answer 1

In today’s time computer crime is very rampant but still most computer criminals go un prosecuted.

1. jurisdiction

Most of the time, the individual carrying out the wrongdoing is situated outside of the nation (or if nothing else outside the lawful locale of the court and prosecutors looking for the conviction). It's sufficiently hard to effectively indict a digital criminal if they start in an indistinguishable locale from the casualty, yet near inconceivable when both dwell in various areas.

Ordinarily we effectively gather great lawful proof and even confirm the character and area of the digital criminal, however we have no lawful capacity to capture the individual.

2.We don’t know how to prosecute

Our legitimate framework, refined over hundreds of years, was fashioned in the physical world for physical wrongdoings. Web wrongdoing isn't even three decades old.

Territories, urban communities, and states experience serious difficulties making sense of what is or isn't illicit in the PC world for a specific area, particularly if that wrongdoing includes PCs or individuals outside of their ward.

3 . Crimes not reported

by far most of web violations are never detailed.The clear majority have no clue about where and how to report web wrongdoing, and on the off chance that they do, occasionally does anything happen to it.

4 . Evidence problem

Most of us believe we're equipped for gathering proof that may prompt somebody's distinguishing proof and capture. Be that as it may, would that confirmation stand up in court. Bulletproof proof of digital wrongdoing is difficult to get.