Automata
Prove that regular languages are closed under difference, using an indirect proof (leveraging the closure of other set operators).
Let Σ be an alphabet and two regular languages.
We know that regular languages are closed under intersection and under complementation.
We can write Difference as follows:
--> Hence Regular languages are closed under set differentiation.
Automata Prove that regular languages are closed under difference, using an indirect proof (leveraging the closure...
Show using a cross-product construction that the class of regular languages is closed under set difference. You do not need an inductive proof, but you should convincingly explain why your construction works.
Show using a cross-product construction that the class of regular languages is closed under set difference. You do not need an inductive proof, but you should convincingly explain why your construction works.
2. (15) Show using a cross-product construction that the class of regular languages is closed under set difference. You do not need an inductive proof, but you should convincingly explain why your construction works.
Prove that the class of regular languages is closed under intersection. That is, show that if ? and ? are regular languages, then ? ∩ ? = {? | ? ∈ ? ??? ? ∈ ?} is also regular. Hint:givenaDFA? =(?,Σ,?,?,?)thatrecognizes?andaDFA? =(?,Σ,?,?,?)that11111 22222 recognizes ?, construct a new DFA ? = (?, Σ, ?, ?0, ?) that recognizes ? ∩ ? and justify why your construction is correct.
3. (20 pt.) Prove that the following language is not regular using the closure properties of regular languages. C = {0"1"|m,n0 and mon} Hint: find a regular language L such that CNL is not regular and use the closure properties of regular languages to show that this means that C is not regular.
(20 pt.) Prove that the class of regular languages is closed under reverse. That is, show that if A is a regular language, then AR = {wR WE A} is also regular. Hint: given a DFA M = (Q,2,8,90, F) that recognizes A, construct a new NFA N = (Q', 2,8', qo',F') that recognizes AR and justify why your construction is correct.
1. (Non-regular languages) Prove that the following languages are not regular. You may use the pumping lemma and the closure of the class of regular languages under union, intersection, complement, and reverse (b) L2 = { w | w ∈ {0, 1}* is not a palindrome }. A palindrome is a string that reads the same forward and backward
5. (20 pt.) Prove that the class of regular languages is closed under reverse. That is, show that if A is a regular language, then AR = {wR W E A} is also regular. Hint: given a DFA M = (Q,2,8,90, F) that recognizes A, construct a new NFA N = (Q', 2,8', qo',F') that recognizes AR and justify why your construction is correct.
Problem 3 [20 points Prove that the class of regular languages is closed under reverse. That is, show that if A is a regular language, then AR -[wR | w e A is also regular. [Hint: given a DFA M = (Q,Σ, δ, q0,F) that recognizes A, construct a new NFA (Q', Σ,8,6, F') that recognizes AR.]
Automata Question (3) Show that the family of deterministic context-free languages is not closed under union and intersection.