Base case(option B): The n=1 case true, since 50-1 = 0 is a multiple of 4
Inductive Hypothesis(option B): Now assume that we have proved that 5n-1-1 is a multiple of 4 for some arbitary integer n>=1
Finishing the inductive step(option B): We now substitute n+1 and get that 5n-1 is a multiple of 4, since 5 mod 4=1.This concludes the proof.
(Option C): (Nothing more needs to be added)
Proof by induction consists of three step process, first we prove the base case , then we assume for some integer n our statement is correct i.e, inductive hypothesis then at last we prove that for n+1 also our assumption is correct.
To Prove: 5n-1-1 is divisible by 4
Base case: For n=1 , the statement is true i.e, 51-1-1=1-1=0 is divisible by 4.
Inductive hypothesis: For some arbitary integer n>=1 we assume that our statement is correct i.e, 5n-1-1 is divisible by 4 for some arbitary n>=1.
Finishing inductive step(proof for n+1): For n+1, we get statement as 5n+1-1-1=5n-1, here 5n-1 is always divisible by 4 as (5n)%4=1 and subtracting 1 from it will give us 0 so (5n-1)%4=0. Hence proved.
So if you still have any doubt regarding this solution please feel free to ask it in the comment section below and if it is helpful then please upvote this solution, THANK YOU.
Discreet mathematics Question 19 6 Assemble an inductive proof to show that the quantity 5-1 is...
50. What is wrong with this "proof? "Theorem For every positive integer n = (n + /2. Basis Step: The formula is true for n = 1. Inductive Step: Suppose that +Y/2. Then -(+972 +*+- +*+1)/2 + + + /- + 1). By the inductive hypothesis, we have + /2-[(++P/2, completing the + inductive step.
3 For each positive integer n, define E(n) 2+4++2n (a) Give a recursive definition for E(n). (b) Let P(n) be the statement E(n) nn1)." Complete the steps below to give a proof by induction that P(n) holds for every neZ+ i. Verify P(1) is true. (This is the base step.) ii. Let k be some positive integer. We assume P(k) is true. What exactly are we assuming is true? (This is the inductive hypothesis.) iii. What is the statement P(k...
In the following problem, we will work through a proof of an important theorem of arithmetic. Your job will be to read the proof carefully and answer some questions about the argument. Theorem (The Division Algorithm). For any integer n ≥ 0, and for any positive integer m, there exist integers d and r such that n = dm + r and 0 ≤ r < m. Proof: (By strong induction on the variable n.) Let m be an arbitrary...
Let S(n) be a statement parameterized by a positive integer n. Consider a proof that uses strong induction to prove that for all n 4.S(n) is true. The base case proves that S(4), S(5), S(6), S(7), and S(8) are all true. Select the correct expressions to complete the statement of what is assumed and proven in the inductive step. Supposed that for k> (1?),s() is true for everyj in the range 4 through k. Then we will show that (22)...
The symbol N denotes the nonnegative integers, that is, N= {0,1,2,3,...}. The symbol R denotes the real numbers. In each of the proofs by induction in problems (2), (3), and (4), you must explicitly state and label the goal, the predicate P(n), the base case(s), the proof of the base case(s), the statement of the inductive step, and its proof. Your proofs should have English sentences connecting and justifying the formulas. As an example of the specified format, consider the...
1. What is wrong with the following proof that shows all integers are equal? (Please explain which step in this proof is incorrect and why is it so.) Let P(n) be the proposition that all the numbers in any set of size n are equal. 1) Base case: P(1) is clearly true. 2) Now assume that P(n) is true. That is for any set of size n all the numbers are the same. Consider any set of n + 1...
Question 1 result in a grade of zero for the assignment and will bo subject to disciplinary action. Part I: Strong Induction (50 pt.) (40 pt., 20/10 pt. each) Prove each of the following statements using strong induction. For each statement, answer the following questions. a. (4/2 pt.) Complete the basis step of the proof by showing that the base cases are true. b. (4/2 pt.) What is the inductive hypothesis? C. (4/2 pt.) what do you need to show...
please answer all the questions. just rearranging. Explanation is not needed. Use modular arithmetic to prove that 3|(221 – 1) for an integer n > 0. Hence, 3|(221 – 1) for n > 0. To show that 3|(221 – 1), we can show that (221 – 1) = 0 (mod 3). We have: (221 – 1) = (4” – 1) (mod 3) Then, (22n – 1) = (1 - 1) = 0 (mod 3) Since 4 = 1 (mod 3),...
please do question 4 and 5 and state if the statement is true or false. please and thank you 1.1 BASIC LOGIC which net "There exits EN such that for every E nd > 1 & Why did we eaten ", bet not > Oor ">" Why didn't we change the and to an "or"? Note that the symbol wands for greater than or equal to and so the nation of i n - lisbot greater than and mot equal...
QUESTION: PROVE THE FOLLOWING 4.3 THEOREM IN THE CASE r=1(no induction required, just use the definition of the determinants) Theorem 4.3. The determinant of an n × n matrix is a linear function of each row when the remaining rows are held fixed. That is, for 1 Sr S n, we have ar-1 ar-1 ar-1 ar+1 ar+1 ar+1 an an rt whenever k is a scalar and u, v, and each a are row vectors in F". Proof. The proof...