Question

Abottle contains a label stating that it contains pils with 500 mg of vitamin C, and another bottle contains a label stating that contains pills with 325 mg of aspirin. When testing claims about the mean contents of the pills, which would have more serious implications: rejection of the Wamin C claim or rejection of the aspirin daim? Considering only a typer and using the same sample s wise to use the same significance level for hypothesis about the man amount of vitamin C and the mean amount of aspirin? Rejection of the cam about claim about the aspirin is more serious because the wrong dosage out more serious adverse racons than a wrong desage I would be we love cance level for being the

Answer 1

Answer:

Here the rejection of Baye aspirin claim mean content of 350 spills have more implications which is due to the wrong dosage of aspirin i.e., more than wrong dosage of the vitamn C.

It is wise to utilize the smaller level of significance for the test hypothesis about mean amount of aspirin then the vitamin C.