Please show all the work and as much detail as possible!!
Please show all the work and as much detail as possible!! Question 3 (20 pts In...
Can you please answer this question with detail? Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 869 people were selected for grand jury duty and 42% of them were from the same ethnicity. Among the people eligible for grand jury duty, 78.2% were of this ethnicity. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, conclusion...
what is the use of statistics in the article. i need it to be detailed Castaneda v Partida: frequentist treatment is contained of An interesting and celebrated example of application of a Ztest for a proportion in a verdict of the U.S. Supreme Court. The beginning of the story a lower court Partida seeks habeas is told in s document s relief contending that he was denied due process and equal pro- e grand jury of Hidalgo County, Teras, which...
Z= ?? 8.2.31-T Question Help in a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 865 people were selected for grand jury duty and 39% of them were from the same thinly Among the people eligible for grand jury duty, 79.9% were of this ethnicity. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative...
In a recent court case it was found that during a period of 11 years 881 people were selected for grand jury duty and 41% of them were from the same ethnicity. Among the people eligible for grand jury duty, 80.2% were of this ethnicity. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the selection process is biased against allowing this ethnicity to sit on the grand jury. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, conclusion...
( Castaneda v Partida: frequentist treatment An interesting and celebrated example of application of a Z-test for a proportion is contained in a verdict of the U.S. Supreme Court. The beginning of the story is told in a document of Partida seeks habeas corpus relief contending that he was denied due process and equal pro- tection of law because the grand jury of Hidalgo County, Teras, which indicted him, was a lower court unconstitutionally underrepresented by Mezican-Americans. This went to...
please show as much work as possible Page |1 EG e 2019 Please show your worlearly to eive fuires. ( Vor wants to study the effectiveness of the Statistics course to improve students' scores included a pre-testing score and post-testing score of each student. To compare the differences, I computed (post-testing score - pre-testing score). Seven students were randomly selected and completed both tests. The results follow. Let 1-a = 0.99 and a = 0.01. %3D Post-Testing score Pre-Testing score...