A cohort study evaluating causes of mortality among 20,000 men (aged 40-59) with coronary heart disease was conducted, following men for 2 years. If were smokers at the time of enrollment, they were told of the continued health risks associated with smoking. The number of deaths occurring by the end of the 2-year period among men classified by smoking behavior are given below. Fill in the mortality rate for each group.
Smoker at baseline and continued smoking through study |
Smoker at baseline and quit at baseline (did not smoke during study) |
Past smoker at baseline (stayed not smoking in study) |
Never smoker |
|
Alive at end of study |
4920 |
1840 |
3800 |
7840 |
Deceased at end of study |
1080 |
2000 |
4000 |
8000 |
Mortality rate (per 1000 per year) |
a) What is the rate of excess mortality among smokers (who smoked during the follow-up period) as compared to the never smokers?
b) What is the rate of excess mortality among smokers as compared to the men who quit smoking at baseline?
|
Smoker at baseline and quit at baseline (did not smoke during study) |
Past smoker at baseline (stayed not smoking in study) |
Never smoker |
|
Alive at end of study |
4920 |
1840 |
3800 |
7840 |
Deceased at end of study |
1080 |
2000 |
4000 |
8000 |
Mortality rate (per 1000 per year) |
(1080/2*(4920+1080))*1000 = 90 per 1000 per year |
(2000/2*(1840+2000))*1000 = 260 per 1000 per year |
(4000/2*(4000+3800))*1000 = 256 per 1000 per year |
(8000/2*(7840+8000))*1000 = 253 per 1000 per year |
Formula used to calculate mortality rate (per 1000 per year) in above table is =
(# deceased / (# participated in study*# years))*1000
# participated in study = (#deceased + #Alive) at end of the study
Thank you for the question. The questions a and b are bit confusing. I have answered as much I understood. If you have any doubt please ask in comment section.
A cohort study evaluating causes of mortality among 20,000 men (aged 40-59) with coronary heart disease...
The cohort study also provided mortality rates for cardiovascular disease among smokers and nqnsmokers. The following table presents lung cancer mortanty data an cardiovascular disease mortality data. ortality rates (per 1,000 person-years), rate ratios, and excess deaths from lung cancer an cardiovascular disease by smoking status, Doll and Hill physician cohort study, Great Britain, 1951-1961 Attributable risk percent among Mortality rate per 1000 person-years Non-smokers 0.07 7.32 Excess deaths per 1,000 Rate ratio ponears mokers 1.3 Lung cancer 1.37 0.99...
The study also provided mortality rates for cardiovascular disease among smokers and non-smokers. The following table presents lung cancer mortality data and comparable cardiovascular disease mortality data. Table 2. Mortality rates (per 1,000 person-years), rate ratios, and excess deaths from lung cancer and cardiovascular disease by smoking status, Doll and Hill physician cohort study, Great Britain, 1951-1961. Mortality rate per 1,000 person-years Smokers Non-smokers All Rate ratio Excess deaths Attributable risk per 1,000 person-years smokers 1.23 2.19 percent among 1.30...
Cohort Study In October 1951, Doll and Hill mailed a short questionnaire to 59.000 men and women whose names were on the current British Medical Registrar (i.e.. current physicians) and were residents of the United Kingdom. In addition to name, age, and address, they were asked to say whether they currently smoked, had previously smoked and had given it up, or they had never smoked regularly (one cigarette per day for at least one year). The smokers and former smokers...
Lung Cancer & Smoking Case Study A causal relationship between cigarette smoking and lung cancer was first suspected in the 1920s on the basis of clinical observations. To test this apparent association, numerous epidemiologic studies were undertaken between 1930 and 1960. Two studies were conducted by Richard Doll and Austin Bradford Hill in Great Britain The first was a case-control study begun in 1947 comparing the smoking habits of lung cancer patients with the smoking habits of other patients. The...
All of the following questions are in relation to the following journal article which is available on Moodle: Parr CL, Magnus MC, Karlstad O, Holvik K, Lund-Blix NA, Jaugen M, et al. Vitamin A and D intake in pregnancy, infant supplementation and asthma development: the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 2018:107:789-798 QUESTIONS: 1. State one hypothesis the author's proposed in the manuscript. 2. There is previous research that shows that adequate Vitamin A intake is required...