Question

3) What are the three laws of robotics that Isaac Asimov described? Do you agree with these laws? Are there any weaknesses/loopholes in the laws? If an artificial intelligence were one day created that could truly think for itself, what do you think would be the possible ethical implications of this with regard to Asimov's laws of robotics?

Answer 1

Please do Like, If you are impressed with the answer

If you have any doubt, you can comment. I will explain

Answer:

The best known set of laws are Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics". These were introduced in his 1942 short story "Runaround", although they were foreshadowed in a few earlier stories. The Three Laws are:

1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

Near the end of his book Foundation and Earth, a zeroth law was introduced, with the original three suitably rewritten as subordinate to it:

0.A robot may not injure humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.

Adaptations and extensions exist based upon this framework. As of 2011 they remain a “A fictional device".

Yes I agree with the Isaac Asimov's laws. But robots should not injure human being or any living being

Yes, there is a weakness in Three laws, Robots may dominate the human beings by means of protecting there existence

Yes, If an artificial intelligence were one day created that could truly think for itself , it could really think for itself.

Of course there might be a chance of raising ethical implications of this with regard to Asimov's Three laws of robotics