Question

A manufacturer claims that the mean driving per mile of its sedans is less than that...

A manufacturer claims that the mean driving per mile of its sedans is less than that of its leading competitor. You conduct a study using 28 randomly selected sedans from the manufacturer and 32 from the leading competitor. The results are given below

Sample statistics for Sedan Driving Costs

Manufacturer

Competitor

X1 = 0.48 /mi

X2 = 0.5 /mi
s1 = 0.05 /mi s2 = 0.07 /mi
n1 = 28 n2 = 32

3. What is the pooled standard deviation?

4. Observed test statistic

5. The degrees of freedom for the test statistic

Tries 0/5

6. P-value:

Tries 0/5
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

3)

Pooled Std.dev
sp = sqrt((((n1 - 1)*s1^2 + (n2 - 1)*s2^2)/(n1 + n2 - 2))*(1/n1 + 1/n2))
sp = sqrt((((28 - 1)*0.05^2 + (32 - 1)*0.07^2)/(28 + 32 - 2))*(1/28 + 1/32))
sp = 0.0159

4)


Test statistic,
t = (x1bar - x2bar)/sp
t = (0.48 - 0.5)/0.0159
t = -1.258

5)

df = n1 + n2 - 2 = 58

6)


P-value Approach
P-value = 0.1067

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
A manufacturer claims that the mean driving per mile of its sedans is less than that...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • A local bank claims that the waiting time for its customers to be served is the lowest in the area. A competitor bank checks the waiting times at both banks. The sample statistics are listed below. Us...

    A local bank claims that the waiting time for its customers to be served is the lowest in the area. A competitor bank checks the waiting times at both banks. The sample statistics are listed below. Use P-values to test the local bank claim. Use a "alpha" = 0.05 Local Bank: n1= 45. x1= 5.3 minutes. s1= 1.1 minutes. Competitor bank: n2= 50. x2= 23. s2= 1.9.   

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 12 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1150 feet with a standard deviation of 27 feet. A sample of 77 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1100 feet with a standard deviation of 23 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 18 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1120 feet with a standard deviation of 20 feet. A sample of 13 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1110 feet with a standard deviation of 25 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let u be the true mean...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is great...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 18 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 37 feet. A sample of 13 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1190 feet with a standard deviation of 39 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ 1 be the true...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 13 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1090 feet with a standard deviation of 21 feet. A sample of 9 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1030 feet with a standard deviation of 42 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 10 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1250 feet with a standard deviation of 31 feet. A sample of 19 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 33 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 99 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 13501350 feet with a standard deviation of 4242 feet. A sample of 1717 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 12801280 feet with a standard deviation of 2828 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean...

  • Need step 3 only. A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900...

    Need step 3 only. A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900 MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 15 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1280 feet with a standard deviation of 21 feet. A sample of 10 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 40 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let...

  • A manufacturer claims that the mean lifetime of its lithium batteries is less than 1095 hours....

    A manufacturer claims that the mean lifetime of its lithium batteries is less than 1095 hours. A homeowner selects 27 of these batteries and finds the mean lifetime to be 1065 hours with a standard deviation of 76 hours. Test the manufacturer's claim. Use a = 0.02. P-value = 0.112 > 0.02; do not reject H0; There is not enough evidence support the claim that mean is less than 1500. ОА P-value = 0.025 0.02, do not reject HO, There...

  • A manufacturer claims that the mean lifetime, it, of its light bulbs is 44 months. The...

    A manufacturer claims that the mean lifetime, it, of its light bulbs is 44 months. The standard deviation of these lifetimes is 5 months. Fifty bulbs are selected at random, and their mean lifetime is found to be 45 months. Can we conclude, at the 0.05 level of significance, that the mean lifetime of light bulbs made by this manufacturer differs from 44 months? Perform a two-tailed test. Then fill in the table below Carry your intermediate computations to at...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT