ZuoTi.Pro
Question

Juan sued Abram in state court, and lost his case, he immediately appealed to the intermediate...

Juan sued Abram in state court, and lost his case, he immediately appealed to the intermediate level appellate court for his state, where he lost again. after losing again at the state supreme court level, he is so angry that he wants to take his case all the way to the U.S supreme court. Does Juan have the right to have his cased heard by the U.S supreme court? what is the procedure he would use to get the US supreme court to hear his case?

business   Operations-Management   
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Next > < Previous
Sort answers by oldest

Homework Answers

Answer #1

In order for the case to be heared in the US supeme court, the case must involve an issue of federal law. If the case does not fulfil this criteria, it is likely to stay in the state supreme court only, an its decision would be final. If the case involves the issue of federal law, and the plaintiff has lost the case in all lower courts, he /she can prepare a petition of certiorari, on the basis of which, the court will decide whether it would hear you case or not. The petition involves history of the case, relevant facts,and legal issues related to the case. Here, the other party will also have a chance to put forward his /her point in form of a response. The petition would be examined by the supreme court staff which would send it to the panel of judges with a recommendation. If the judges decide to hear the case, they will issue a writ of certiorari.

0 0
Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Juan sued Abram in state court, and lost his case, he immediately appealed to the intermediate...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Log In

Sign Up

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions

  • Supreme Court. Jim, who is a bit eccentric, says that he is fed up with the...

    Supreme Court. Jim, who is a bit eccentric, says that he is fed up with the way a certain employer in his town treats employees and that he is going to sue that employer in an effort to improve matters. Jim also says that he is going to start his case at the appellate court level, skipping over all those "lesser" judges. Jim says that those justices will surely hear him out and that he will also seek a jury....

  • 1. Kari and Lillian, who are citizens of Mississippi, are involved in a case related to...

    1. Kari and Lillian, who are citizens of Mississippi, are involved in a case related to the adoption of their child. Over this case, Mississippi state courts have​ a. ​concurrent jurisdiction with federal courts. b. ​concurrent jurisdiction with other state courts. c. ​exclusive jurisdiction. d. ​no jurisdiction. D’Antoni files a suit in a federal district court against Enya. D’Antoni loses the suit, appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and loses again. D’Antoni asks the United...

  • In a 1992 case entitled Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc., the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled...

    In a 1992 case entitled Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc., the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled that when a substance in food causes injury to someone consuming the food, just because the substance was natural to the food will not bar recovery against the seller of the food. If, in a 2019 case involving a consumer’s injury caused by a fish bone in a bowl of fish chowder, the court follows the decision in Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc., the...

  • 1. The Smith Company, from Kentucky, has sued the Jones Company, from Ohio, claiming that there...

    1. The Smith Company, from Kentucky, has sued the Jones Company, from Ohio, claiming that there was a defect in the manufacturing of a piece of high tech equipment that Smith uses to manufacture precision routing devises for phone equipment. The litigation will require expert testimony from some of the leading engineers in the industry. Negotiation prior to filing the suit yielded no progress. Litigation will likely be long and complex. Which of the following would be the most likely...

  • Shift End Poon Enter Del LANDMARK COURT CASE Case Legalizes Abortion In 1970, a single woman...

    Shift End Poon Enter Del LANDMARK COURT CASE Case Legalizes Abortion In 1970, a single woman in Texas became pregnant. The ruling came too late for Jane Roe to have the She had difficulty finding work because of her preg. abortion she originally sought, of course, but it nancy and feared the stigma of an illegitimate birth. affected the rights of all women who would seek Under the fictitious name "Jane Roe," the woman sued abortions from that time on....

  • FACTS: Defendant Park, the president of a national food- chain corporation, was charged, along with the...

    FACTS: Defendant Park, the president of a national food- chain corporation, was charged, along with the corpora- tion, with violating the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act by allowing food in the warehouse to be exposed to rodent contamination. Park had conceded that his respon- sibility for the “entire operation” included warehouse sanitation, but he claimed that he had delegated the responsibility for sanitation to dependable subordinates. He admitted at trial that he had received a warning let- ter from...

  • One of the most important Title VII civil rights cases is McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,...

    One of the most important Title VII civil rights cases is McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973).  This case basically established what the burden of proof must be in order for someone to prove discrimination. Like most lawsuits, this case started out with a disgruntled employee, Percy Green. Mr. Green claimed that his employer, McDonnel-Douglas, had discriminated against him based on his race. This assignment will take you through the long legal history of this case. Don’t worry...

  • Please Help me Answer The 3 questions on the Last Page Now !!!!! One more viewpoint...

    Please Help me Answer The 3 questions on the Last Page Now !!!!! One more viewpoint of the 6th Amendment to tie it back to the Ist! Amendment from last week. Look at the case summary and facts for Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. 70,127 S. Ct. 649 (2006) A defendant in a murder trial is not deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury if courtroom spectators wear buttons showing a picture of the deceased. Facts Matthew...

  • Case Brief: "Synder vs Phelps" using the IRAC method 150 words required CHAPTER 2 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW...

    Case Brief: "Synder vs Phelps" using the IRAC method 150 words required CHAPTER 2 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Fox Box AND E-COMMERCE 31 CASE 2.3 U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE Free Speech Snyder v. Phelps 131 S.Ct. 1207, 179 LEd.2d 172. Web 2011 U.S. Lexis 1903 (2011) Supreme Court of the United States "Speech is powerful. It can stir pople to action, move Amendment protected Westboro's speech and reversed the them to tears of both joy and sorrow, and as it did judgment,...

  • 1. Which article and section of the U.S. Constitution outlines the concept of extradition        (returning fugitives...

    1. Which article and section of the U.S. Constitution outlines the concept of extradition        (returning fugitives to the state where the crime occurred).   2. A member of the Senate can kill a bill by talking it to death in a procedure known as a 3. Who acts as the President of the Senate? 4. Who is the current Speaker of the House of Representatives? 5. Which of the following are a Constitutional requirement for becoming          president of the United States?...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT