Question

How could you conduct a study on the extent to which people obey authority in a way that minimizes risks and deception as much as possible? (Note: Such a study would not have to look at all like Milgram’s.)

Provide a substantive, complete summary of the proposed study and how it minimizes risks/deception.（3 paragraphs at least）

Answer 1

solution:

1)It is a broadly acknowledged hypothesis in brain science that individuals are bound to comply with a definitive figure to execute certain directions. This can be exhibited tentatively in the accompanying setup:-

2)A gathering of members can be told to play out certain dishonest directions upon the guidelines of the experimenters. The members would be educated in clear, conclusive terms about the real repercussions of following up on the guidelines.

3)The members would likewise be given the decision to pull out of the test on the off chance that they feel that they're breaking a line of moral direct. As such, one will probably recognize an individual's choice being affected under strain versus an individual being impacted by power and having the choice to pull back from the setup by using through and through freedom.

4)The dangers here are limited, as the unbalanced condition that could emerge from a test retaining the part of choice, is dispensed with. Moreover, the investigation would traverse a considerable measure of time and range over a wide range of members to limit the danger of over speculation.