Show that every infinite Turing-recognizable language is the range of some one-to-one computable function.
set of all string over any finite alphabet can be enumerated i.e. it take finite number of steps taken to generate an element of language.
suppose alphabet Σ = {a,b}
Σ* = {ε,a,b,aa,ab,ba,bb...................}
Go length wise and dictionary order
length 0 ε
length 1 a,b
length 2 aa,ab,ba,bb and so on.........
Here exists a enumerated method through which any string over set Σ = {a,b} can be generated in constant time (through index)
Therefore, set of all string over any finite alphabet Σ = {a,b}
are countable .
Turing-recognizable language is Recursive Language.
Recursive language is subset of all string over any finite alphabet
Σ = {a,b}
Therefore ,Recursive Language is also countable.
Hence,every infinite Turing-recognizable language is the range
of some one-to-one computable function.
Show that every infinite Turing-recognizable language is the range of some one-to-one computable function.
Classify the language { (G) | G is a CFG, L(G) contains a palindrome}\ as (a) decidable (b) Turing-recognizable but not co-Turing recognizable (c) co-Turing recognizable but not Turing-recognizable (d) neither Turing nor co-Turing recognizable Justify your answer
Give examples of the following sets (languages): a. A set (language) that is Turing-recognizable but not decidable b. A set (language) that is decidable but not context-free c. A set (language) that is context-free but not regular
A Turing machine with doubly infinite tape (TMDIT) is similar to an ordinary Turing machine except that its tape is infinite to the left as well as to the right. The tape is initially filled with blanks except for the portion that contains the input. Computation is defined as usual except that the head never encounters an end to the tape as it moves leftward. Show that the class of languages recognized by TDMITs is the same as the class...
an example, show that Turing-recognizable languages are not closed under comple 1. Using mentation
Q1: Which of the following claims are true?* 1 point The recognizable languages are closed under union and intersection The decidable lanquages are closed under union and intersection The class of undecidable languages contains the class of recognizable anguages For every language A, at least one of A or A*c is recognizable Other: This is a required question Q2: Which of the following languages are recognizable? (Select all that apply) 1 point EDFA-{ «A> 1 A is a DFA and...
Use a Turing Reduction to show that the following language is undecidable. L={ | L(M) is infinite}.
A Turing machine M decides a language L is M: Group of answer choices All of these apply. Accepts all strings in L and M rejects all strings not in L. Accepts some strings in L and M rejects some strings not in L. Accepts all strings in L that are recognizable.
Please also note that there might be multiple answers for each question. Q1: Which of the following claims are true?* 1 point The recognizable languages are closed under union and intersection The decidable languages are closed under union and intersection The class of undecidable languages contains the class of recognizable languages For every language A, at least one of A or A*c is recognizable Other: This is a required question Q2: Which of the following languages are recognizable? (Select all...
Is the following a theorem? Every infinite recursive subset of is the range of a strictly increasing primitive recursive function.
Show that the language {(M1,M2): M1 and M2 are Turing machines with L(M1) is subset of L(M2) is undecidable